Live data from Hacker News

Anthropic Joins the Blender Development Fund as Corporate Patron

blender.org

81–90 of 230 posts

Re: Anthropic Joins the Blender Development Fund as Corporate Patron

#81
post #33
post #10

> improve foundational features like the Blender Python API, which enables developers and artists alike So they want claude to be able to talk to blender

https://www.blender.org/development/blender-lab-activity-rep...

With examples: https://www.blender.org/lab/mcp-server/

Re: Anthropic Joins the Blender Development Fund as Corporate Patron

#82
Ugh. I love Blender, it's the greatest software of all time according to myself, and I absolutely hate this and I am terrified at what it implies. If they just want name recognition ok fine, but my guess is Anthropic will want changes to Blender itself and I find that totally unacceptable.

Ah well, the online artist community is unusually principled on matters like this, especially compared to here. If they start doing shady stuff it will get forked and probably spell the end of the Blender foundation, which would still be really bad of course.

Sigh. Not a happy Tuesday.

Re: Anthropic Joins the Blender Development Fund as Corporate Patron

#83
post #56
post #43

Not sure why this is getting backlash. Just look at https://fund.blender.org . Other corporate sponsors are Google, Meta, Nvidia, Netflix, even Adidas. This just means more support for a major OSS project.

A lot of those companies likely sponsor it because they use it themselves, and actively benefit from its continued development. The incentives are at least somewhat aligned. I doubt Anthropic has much use for such a tool internally. They're sponsoring it because they want to inject their slop into it and replace the people who do use it.

I don't think any slop is getting injected into Blender:

> Blender Foundation’s mission remains to empower artists with free/open source technology and tools. Yet, we also maintain APIs for individuals and corporations to extend Blender, also beyond what’s aligned with Blender’s mission. We consider this part of the Software Freedom that’s embodied with Blender’s GNU GPL license.

Re: Anthropic Joins the Blender Development Fund as Corporate Patron

#85
post #70
post #9

There will be community backlash. And it will not be uncalled for. Sad news.

I don't think they can tell Blender what to do. As such it's just more money for Blender! Yes, Anthropic can use the Python API to do their AI BS, but an improved Python API is also good for anyone else. This doesn't mean that Blender themselves are integrating any gen AI (if you don't already count the denoise filters). Do you really think Blender should have denied the donation?

I think they should have, it does not align with their community. Could they have denied, I am not sure about the legalities.

Money is good. But not antagonizing your community (as an open source project) is better.

Re: Anthropic Joins the Blender Development Fund as Corporate Patron

#86
post #40

Can you imagine going to a football match and second-guessing which are the players who look human, but skin-deep are actually androids made at a factory? This is what it feels like with music and literature right now with so much AI. There are some pockets where you still can say "that's human-made", like 3D-rendered feature films with some particular artistic direction. That, it seems, AI companies also want it to…

The pearl clutching over the pedigree of art is getting tiring. No one has really ever cared. Most mainstream music is written by corporate teams. Elvis didn't write his own music. Frank Sinatra didn't write his own music. Nearly all pop artists don't. But suddenly, people are now clamoring for art, but they never gave a shit to begin with. Most people can't tell AI written music from anything else if a human perform…

I arrange gigs with real bands playing music. At least that will take quite a while to replace with AI. I am curious to see if we will get a backlash eventually around the content. It will probably be a mix of everything.

Storytelling didn’t go away when the theatre was invented. Theatre didn’t go away when cinema arrived. Cinema wasn’t replaced when radio arrived, ad that wasn’t completely replace by TV, etc. It is a mix of things these days and it will probably remain that way.

Re: Anthropic Joins the Blender Development Fund as Corporate Patron

#87

These AI companies need to be kept away from Open Source projects. A sad day for Blender :(

Weird attitude when 3D artists LOVE AI powered denoising and upscaling. Praying for the day AI makes it so I never have to UV unwrap a mesh again.

Yes, Claude is the AI doing my denoising. I keep running out of tokens with my 4k renders.

AI is a nebulous term. AI denoisers are not the same thing as an LLM or image gen model, the ire is directed at LLMs and not AI denoisers because they are completely different things.

Re: Anthropic Joins the Blender Development Fund as Corporate Patron

#88
post #10

> improve foundational features like the Blender Python API, which enables developers and artists alike So they want claude to be able to talk to blender

We (I) need that.

"Some software" is approaching levels of complexity where, perhaps, it gets to a point where a human is barely able to even use it.

At the same time (brave new world) LLM assisted software opens up the possibility of levels of complexity we would not have considered before.

Re: Anthropic Joins the Blender Development Fund as Corporate Patron

#90
post #40

Can you imagine going to a football match and second-guessing which are the players who look human, but skin-deep are actually androids made at a factory? This is what it feels like with music and literature right now with so much AI. There are some pockets where you still can say "that's human-made", like 3D-rendered feature films with some particular artistic direction. That, it seems, AI companies also want it to…

The pearl clutching over the pedigree of art is getting tiring. No one has really ever cared. Most mainstream music is written by corporate teams. Elvis didn't write his own music. Frank Sinatra didn't write his own music. Nearly all pop artists don't. But suddenly, people are now clamoring for art, but they never gave a shit to begin with. Most people can't tell AI written music from anything else if a human perform…

If Frank Sinatra had Ai he woulnt have had to perform any of that slop by Cole Porter, Irving Berlin, Kurt Weill, Rodgers & Hammerstein and other composers no one cares about
Post reply on HN