Live data from Hacker News

A programmable watch you can actually wear

hackster.io

81–90 of 137 posts

Re: A programmable watch you can actually wear

#81
post #24
post #20

I like a good smart watch and I appreciate open source, but an ESP32 isn't a great pick when low power consumption is important and the device is going to be communicating regularly. I'm surprised LILYGO went that direction in a watch form factor.

What would you suggest instead?

For an application using bluetooth low energy, a Nordic NRF52840 turned out to be the winner.

Re: A programmable watch you can actually wear

#82

There are only a few features I care about in a smartwatch: 1. O2 monitoring. I have sleep apnea and live at high altitude, so this matters to me. 2. Motion sensor. Also mostly for tracking sleep. 3. Vibrator for notifications. 4. A screen backlight. 5. Battery life longer than a week. 6. Waterproof enough to survive a splash in the shower/rain. I consider GPS, cellular, AI, touchscreens, cloud-only sync and control…

Fitbit Inspire3 ?

Re: A programmable watch you can actually wear

#83
post #54
post #20

I like a good smart watch and I appreciate open source, but an ESP32 isn't a great pick when low power consumption is important and the device is going to be communicating regularly. I'm surprised LILYGO went that direction in a watch form factor.

an esp32 on an 1100mah battery will last years on deep sleep, and about a day with wifi on and in high power modes. a pixel watch 4 says they last 30 hours , ambiguously. they use a battery less than half the size. in reality with constant use they'll drop dead in 6 hours. the thing is clunky and heavy , anyway -- so if it lasts as long as an off the shelf watch who cares? also, the primary reason : lilygo shoves ESP…

I'm not sure if my Pixel Watch 3 is much more efficient than your 4 or if by "constant use" you literally mean scrolling through it actively for hours at a time, but I only charge mine maybe twice a week. It's on at all times, connected to my phone via Bluetooth and to my Wi-Fi network when I'm home, and I actively manage any push notifications I get from it, but otherwise it seems to idle fairly efficiently.

Re: A programmable watch you can actually wear

#84
post #54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

an esp32 on an 1100mah battery will last years on deep sleep, and about a day with wifi on and in high power modes. a pixel watch 4 says they last 30 hours , ambiguously. they use a battery less than half the size. in reality with constant use they'll drop dead in 6 hours. the thing is clunky and heavy , anyway -- so if it lasts as long as an off the shelf watch who cares? also, the primary reason : lilygo shoves ESP…

Several Garmin watches last for weeks (24 days full charge, actual 1-2 weeks with heavy gps and fitness tracking), and I struggle to understand why consumers accept anything less. It seems like consumers don't realize what's available.

This. Why would I accept anything else than that?

Re: A programmable watch you can actually wear

#86
post #59
post #56

When can we finally buy a smartwatch that can keep its (color) display ON during the entire day?

September 18, 2020. That's when Apple released their Watch Series 6, which has an always on color display, and enough battery to last all day.

You can also configure PimeTime to have an always-on display, and it should even last more than a day.

Re: A programmable watch you can actually wear

#87

s/Watch/Smartwatch Regular DYI watches aren't big news... (I would be over the moon for a DIY smartwatch with zero AI and e-ink screen.)

Watchy fits the bill:

https://watchy.sqfmi.com/

I have one, its a bit bulkier than I'd thought it would be, but its a fine piece of timekeeping ..

Re: A programmable watch you can actually wear

#88
post #15

This does look very cool. Every peripheral one could think of, even LoRA!

The peripherals are great until you realize there's a dirth of software to use with them .. like, GPS is fun and everything, but not if all you've got is the coordinates ..

I really love the idea of LoRA in a watch though, so I hope that once this gets shipped, the software makes some leaps and bounds ..

Re: A programmable watch you can actually wear

#89

Too bad it seems to not do health monitoring, my main use case of a watch now is sleep tracking with as long battery life as possible

the same for me, however I can imagine that creating a good sleep analysing software based on the hypothethical HRM and accelerometer is mission impossible. I find the best software is Garmin at the moment of writing, or at least suits me well, and it blocks me from buying any opensource watch, unless I want to have two watches on my hands
Post reply on HN