Earlier quoted context omitted.
I call this the Laurie Anderson fallacy, from a line in one of her songs: > "Heaven is exactly like where you are right now, but much, much better." If a million Claudes of compute were accessible, people would not be doing the same things they are now, but more so. They'd be doing very different things we likely can't imagine - in the same way that Alan Turing imagined machines learning from experience, but didn't i…
There's nothing (except their capacity and your token budget I guess) stopping anyone from having a million simultaneous conversations with Claude right now. Maybe a million is a stretch but thousands is completely doable right now. That's thousands of Claudes. Knock yourself out.
If it ever becomes possible to say "build me a unicorn" you're going to get millions of people trying to do the same thing, and you no longer have the same economy.
Because the features that generate unicorns stop being unusual.
Startup slop instead of art slop.
Which is the real problem with AI. Work gets cheap, original value stays expensive no matter how much compute you throw at it.
Because if it gets cheap too, it gets commoditised and stops being valuable.
And globally that applies to everything.
AI will either have to be tightly rationed, or it will murder the competitive economy.