The solar covered parking lots near me are great because they also serve as cover for your car when it’s hot and sunny. It’s not the most cost effective way to install solar, though. A tall structure designed to put the panels high up in the air and leave a lot of space for cars is a lot more expensive than normal rooftop solar or even field setups. This is basically a way to force some of the cost of clean energy as…
A better version for shade and city beautification is to force trees around/within the parking lot.
South Korea Mandates Solar Panels for Public Parking Lots
81–90 of 229 posts
Re: South Korea Mandates Solar Panels for Public Parking Lots
#82Re: South Korea Mandates Solar Panels for Public Parking Lots
#83I really want America to get on board with this. Getting people to not drive is a nearly impossible task given how slow cities move to change the codes, so if we have to have parking lots, put them to use.
If you want America on board, get the people on board. Tell them why it's a good idea to stop driving their car. I'm not saying this to be snarky, but that's what it's going to take.
As an aside, your username reminds me it’s about time for another rewatch of cowboy bebop
Re: South Korea Mandates Solar Panels for Public Parking Lots
#84It seems inefficient to put solar panels over parking areas as it requires significant amount of structure which costs a lot more than shade it creates is worth. Especially compared to how much less structure is needed on more remote solar farms. Maybe I'm just using American mindset where there is lots of open land that is good for solar generation? Perhaps not true in Korea?
Re: South Korea Mandates Solar Panels for Public Parking Lots
#85Authoritarian Asian countries being authoritarian as usual. Wouldn't mind putting up panels if I could sell and use the power. But fuck governments telling property "owners" what they can or can't do.
Re: South Korea Mandates Solar Panels for Public Parking Lots
#86Re: South Korea Mandates Solar Panels for Public Parking Lots
#87Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm an American, and it seems like a great use of land to me. This sort of a policy is particularly sensible in areas where it's hot, and there are extensive parking lots next to places that are mostly active during the day. Instead of just having a heat island, you generate power to run AC in the associated buildings, and you also get shade for the parked cars.
There's a reason centrally planned economies are abject failures. People are incapable of anticipating all of the cascading effects of a "sensible" policy
Re: South Korea Mandates Solar Panels for Public Parking Lots
#88Earlier quoted context omitted.
The lot is always cheaper, as long as the land is cheap. And in most of the US, even land that isn't all that cheap is often best left as a parking lot, economically: You can easily speculate with a parking lot with minimal investment, as the taxes for the empty lot are often low. See all the midwestern cities whose downtowns are 30-40% surface parking. There are all kinds of bad externalities caused by seas of aspha…
I imagine land is more expensive in South Korea than in the US.
Re: South Korea Mandates Solar Panels for Public Parking Lots
#89It seems inefficient to put solar panels over parking areas as it requires significant amount of structure which costs a lot more than shade it creates is worth. Especially compared to how much less structure is needed on more remote solar farms. Maybe I'm just using American mindset where there is lots of open land that is good for solar generation? Perhaps not true in Korea?
Re: South Korea Mandates Solar Panels for Public Parking Lots
#90Earlier quoted context omitted.
There's a reason centrally planned economies are abject failures. People are incapable of anticipating all of the cascading effects of a "sensible" policy
Well, yeah, that's how we got cities with a huge amount of land dedicated to economically parasitic parking lots in the first place.