Live data from Hacker News

We broke 92% of SHA-256 – you should start to migrate from it

stateofutopia.com

81–86 of 86 posts

Re: We broke 92% of SHA-256 – you should start to migrate from it

#81
post #22

From https://stateofutopia.com/papers/2/intermediate-report.pdf > his report was generated on 2026-03-22 as the final artifact of the SHA-256 Cryptanalysis Research Project. Collaboration: Robert V. (research direction, strategy) and Claude/Anthropic (implementation, computation). This Claude guy is pretty prolific it seems. But I'll wait for some known cryptographers to chime in

Perhaps apropos: https://www.theregister.com/2026/03/27/sycophantic_ai_risks/

Re: We broke 92% of SHA-256 – you should start to migrate from it

#82
post #80
post #49

I looked into citation [5] since it sounded interesting but the DOI link has been hallucinated and goes to some other article. I assume many of the others are similarly bogus.

It would be funny/sad if this would end up being a clawdbot thingy or whatever it is called now.

It's similar, but the bot is piloting a human.

Re: We broke 92% of SHA-256 – you should start to migrate from it

#83
Did anyone read the homepage? This is hilarious.

> The State of Utopia is an AI-governed nation with two goals: > 1. ~~Improve the family relationship between its founders Ella and Robert so they can live together as a happy family.~~ Done! > 2. To act in the best interests of all our citizens.

Re: We broke 92% of SHA-256 – you should start to migrate from it

#84
post #14

Seems more like a case study in AI psychosis

Indeed, the text feels very LLM-written.

All interactions with the "author" of the "research" in this thread also.

Reading HNN is not interesting anymore if bots are allowed at the party.

Re: We broke 92% of SHA-256 – you should start to migrate from it

#86

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>Just wait a day or two for the first crypto person who notices to pick the claim to pieces. we went to cryptographic experts first and published second, after they said it is a very good result and worth publishing. We've given a lot of help for reproducibility, the c and python programs encode the claims very precisely and anyone can verify the claims in ten minutes. The bottom line is that you wouldn't have seen t…

[flagged]

Their/they
Post reply on HN