Earlier quoted context omitted.
The actual number is that 98% have less than 2 stars (0 or 1). About 90.25% has zero stars.
[flagged]
90% of Claude-linked output going to GitHub repos w <2 stars
81–90 of 252 posts
Re: 90% of Claude-linked output going to GitHub repos w <2 stars
#82Re: 90% of Claude-linked output going to GitHub repos w <2 stars
#83Earlier quoted context omitted.
My reaction as well -- I have a few dozen public repos of 100% human-written code, most are 0 stars!
I have a few dozen org repos, of course none of them have stars, who stars their corporate repos?
workers on the management track
Re: 90% of Claude-linked output going to GitHub repos w <2 stars
#84Already enough comments about base rate fallacy, so instead I'll say I'm worried for the future of GitHub. Its business is underpinned by pre-AI assumptions about usage that, based on its recent instability, I suspect is being invalidated by surges in AI-produced code and commits. I'm worried, at some point, they'll be forced to take an unpopular stance and either restrict free usage tiers or restrict AI somehow. I'm…
Re: 90% of Claude-linked output going to GitHub repos w <2 stars
#85Perfect example of a base rate fallacy - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base_rate_fallacy What percentage of GitHub activity goes to GitHub repos with less than 2 stars? I would guess it's close to the same number.
The actual number is that 98% have less than 2 stars (0 or 1). About 90.25% has zero stars.
Re: 90% of Claude-linked output going to GitHub repos w <2 stars
#86Shout out to Broadwayscore by thomaspryor@github At 2mo old - nearly a 1GB repo, 24M loc, 52K commits https://github.com/thomaspryor/Broadwayscore Polished site: https://broadwayscorecard.com/
Re: 90% of Claude-linked output going to GitHub repos w <2 stars
#87Shout out to Broadwayscore by thomaspryor@github At 2mo old - nearly a 1GB repo, 24M loc, 52K commits https://github.com/thomaspryor/Broadwayscore Polished site: https://broadwayscorecard.com/
I was really confused how this could be possible for such a seemingly simple site but it looks like it's storing + writing many new commits every time there's a new review, or new financial data, or a new show, etc. Someone might want to tell the author to ask Claude what a database is typically used for...
Re: 90% of Claude-linked output going to GitHub repos w <2 stars
#88Perfect example of a base rate fallacy - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base_rate_fallacy What percentage of GitHub activity goes to GitHub repos with less than 2 stars? I would guess it's close to the same number.
Off topic, but it reminds me of another principle: every geographic heatmap is just a population map. https://xkcd.com/1138/
Re: 90% of Claude-linked output going to GitHub repos w <2 stars
#89Do people really put weight in stars? It seems completely unrelated to anything but, well, popularity. Even when I modify other peoples' code I fork to a private repo and maintain my changes separately, and I'm fairly certain I have never starred a repo.
Re: 90% of Claude-linked output going to GitHub repos w <2 stars
#90In hindsight the headline was a bit more sensational than I meant it to be!