Live data from Hacker News

90% of Claude-linked output going to GitHub repos w <2 stars

claudescode.dev

81–90 of 252 posts

Re: 90% of Claude-linked output going to GitHub repos w <2 stars

#81
post #54
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The actual number is that 98% have less than 2 stars (0 or 1). About 90.25% has zero stars.

[flagged]

It is relevant because if the vast, vast majority of repos have 2 or less stars then it's not that weird that a great deal of repos linked are, too, 2 or less stars.

Re: 90% of Claude-linked output going to GitHub repos w <2 stars

#83

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My reaction as well -- I have a few dozen public repos of 100% human-written code, most are 0 stars!

I have a few dozen org repos, of course none of them have stars, who stars their corporate repos?

> who stars their corporate repos?

workers on the management track

Re: 90% of Claude-linked output going to GitHub repos w <2 stars

#84
post #31

Already enough comments about base rate fallacy, so instead I'll say I'm worried for the future of GitHub. Its business is underpinned by pre-AI assumptions about usage that, based on its recent instability, I suspect is being invalidated by surges in AI-produced code and commits. I'm worried, at some point, they'll be forced to take an unpopular stance and either restrict free usage tiers or restrict AI somehow. I'm…

Counterpoint: Ai coding without GitHub is like performing a stunt where you set yourself on fire but without a fire crew to extinguish the flames

Re: 90% of Claude-linked output going to GitHub repos w <2 stars

#85
post #18

Perfect example of a base rate fallacy - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base_rate_fallacy What percentage of GitHub activity goes to GitHub repos with less than 2 stars? I would guess it's close to the same number.

The actual number is that 98% have less than 2 stars (0 or 1). About 90.25% has zero stars.

You should check recent commits, because obviously there are a lot of forked 0 star repos.

Re: 90% of Claude-linked output going to GitHub repos w <2 stars

#86
post #28

Shout out to Broadwayscore by thomaspryor@github At 2mo old - nearly a 1GB repo, 24M loc, 52K commits https://github.com/thomaspryor/Broadwayscore Polished site: https://broadwayscorecard.com/

Lol @ the proprietary license, you can just copy and use whatever Claude-committed code you want to from that repository.

Re: 90% of Claude-linked output going to GitHub repos w <2 stars

#87
post #32
post #28

Shout out to Broadwayscore by thomaspryor@github At 2mo old - nearly a 1GB repo, 24M loc, 52K commits https://github.com/thomaspryor/Broadwayscore Polished site: https://broadwayscorecard.com/

I was really confused how this could be possible for such a seemingly simple site but it looks like it's storing + writing many new commits every time there's a new review, or new financial data, or a new show, etc. Someone might want to tell the author to ask Claude what a database is typically used for...

It is pretty damn fast though.

Re: 90% of Claude-linked output going to GitHub repos w <2 stars

#88

Perfect example of a base rate fallacy - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base_rate_fallacy What percentage of GitHub activity goes to GitHub repos with less than 2 stars? I would guess it's close to the same number.

Off topic, but it reminds me of another principle: every geographic heatmap is just a population map. https://xkcd.com/1138/

Yep, every time I see a heatmap of Australian lotto winners - very high correlation with Australia's population.

Re: 90% of Claude-linked output going to GitHub repos w <2 stars

#89

Do people really put weight in stars? It seems completely unrelated to anything but, well, popularity. Even when I modify other peoples' code I fork to a private repo and maintain my changes separately, and I'm fairly certain I have never starred a repo.

It's more of a signal for investigating "did this get spammed on Reddit or Twitter", "is this new/old/weird hype", and "does this provide real value"

Re: 90% of Claude-linked output going to GitHub repos w <2 stars

#90
Just to clarify as OP, the point here is not that Claude is not contributing to serious work, just that the dashboard suggests a lot of usage in public GitHub repos seems to be tied to low attention, high LOC repos. This is at least something to keep in mind when considering the composition of coding agent usage, and when assessing the sustainability of current trends.

In hindsight the headline was a bit more sensational than I meant it to be!

Post reply on HN