Live data from Hacker News

Claude Code Cheat Sheet

cc.storyfox.cz

81–90 of 215 posts

Re: Claude Code Cheat Sheet

#82

Shocking how far ahead Claude Code is from Codex on the CLI front.

With Claude Code I created an agent that spawns 5 copies of itself branching git worktrees from main branch using subagents so no context leaks into their instructions. The agent will every 60 seconds analyze the performance of each of the copies which run for about 40 minutes answering the question "what would you do different?". After they finish the task, the parent will update the .claude/ files enhancing itself…

[flagged]

Re: Claude Code Cheat Sheet

#83
post #52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Compression doesn't really explain the whole picture... Where'd you get the data itself? You sense I suppose everyone's skepticism here.

I linked to the source of the data. I don't understand your question? Are you saying the source of the data I linked to is corrupt or lies? Should I be concerned they are selling me false data?

I think the name "massive" combined with the direct link to the docs is a bit misleading; it's not at all obvious from where you land w/ that link that they are selling the actual data. (It kind of sounds like they're selling software that helps you deal with massive data in general, which, no.)

But they are in fact selling the actual data! https://massive.com/pricing

Re: Claude Code Cheat Sheet

#84
post #2

I use Claude Code daily but kept forgetting commands, so I had Claude research every feature from the docs and GitHub, then generate a printable A4 landscape HTML page covering keyboard shortcuts, slash commands, workflows, skills system, memory/CLAUDE.md, MCP setup, CLI flags, and config files. It's a single HTML file - Claude wrote it and I iterated on the layout. A daily cron job checks the changelog and updates t…

Are you OK opening up the source?

Re: Claude Code Cheat Sheet

#85

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Let us perform a thought experiment. You do this. Many others, enthusiastic about both LLMs, and stocks/options, have similar ideas. Do these trading strategies interfere with each other? Does this group of people leveraging Claude for trading end up doing better in the market than those not? What are your benchmarks for success, say, a year into it? Do you have a specific edge in mind which you can leverage, that ot…

Their superior skills with LLMs will give them an edge, of course. Yes, I've met people who think like this lol

People used to laugh about quant strategies the same day, I wouldn't count it out so quickly. One of my friends is already turning meaningful profits with agent driven trading (though he has some experience in trading to begin with.)

Re: Claude Code Cheat Sheet

#88
post #75

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yet all the people OpenAI bought out recently say Codex is “the future”

The bigger question is: does Anthropic have a big enough moat to matter? I've used/use both, and find them pretty comparable, as far as the actual model backing the tool. That wasn't the case 9 months ago, but the world changes quickly.

It matters to me. Claude code is more extensible. They put a lot of efforts to hooks and plugins. Codex may get the job done today. But Claude will evolve faster.

Re: Claude Code Cheat Sheet

#89

Earlier quoted context omitted.

With Claude Code I created an agent that spawns 5 copies of itself branching git worktrees from main branch using subagents so no context leaks into their instructions. The agent will every 60 seconds analyze the performance of each of the copies which run for about 40 minutes answering the question "what would you do different?". After they finish the task, the parent will update the .claude/ files enhancing itself…

I'm curious. How does this coordination work? Do you have any notes that I can refer to?

Just tell Claude to create tmux sessions for each, it can figure out the rest.

Re: Claude Code Cheat Sheet

#90

Shocking how far ahead Claude Code is from Codex on the CLI front.

With Claude Code I created an agent that spawns 5 copies of itself branching git worktrees from main branch using subagents so no context leaks into their instructions. The agent will every 60 seconds analyze the performance of each of the copies which run for about 40 minutes answering the question "what would you do different?". After they finish the task, the parent will update the .claude/ files enhancing itself…

Classic AI psychosis, you can do it with a single prompt, etc. etc.

If you find such a db with options, it will find "successful trading strategies". It will employ overnight gapping, momentum fades, it will try various option deltas likely to work. Maybe it will find something that reduces overall volatility compared to beta, and you can leverage it to your heart's content.

Unfortunately, it won't find anything new. More unfortunately, you probably need 6-10 years and do a walk forward to see if the overall method is trustworthy.

Post reply on HN