Live data from Hacker News

Can I run AI locally?

canirun.ai

81–90 of 382 posts

Re: Can I run AI locally?

#83

I have spent a HUGE amount of time the last two years experimenting with local models. A few lessons learned: 1. small models like the new qwen3.5:9b can be fantastic for local tool use, information extraction, and many other embedded applications. 2. For coding tools, just use Google Antigravity and gemini-cli, or, Anthropic Claude, or... Now to be clear, I have spent perhaps 100 hours in the last year configuring l…

What kind of hardware did you use? I suppose that a 8GB gaming GPU and a Mac Pro with 512 GB unified RAM give quite different results, both formally being local.

Re: Can I run AI locally?

#84

Is it correct that there's zero improvement in performance between M4 (+Pro/Max) and M5 (+Pro/Max) the data looks identical. Also the memory does not seem to improve performance on larger models when I thought it would have? Love the idea though! EDIT: Okay the whole thing is nonsense and just some rough guesswork or asking an LLM to estimate the values. You should have real data (I'm sure people here can help) and p…

> Is it correct that there's zero improvement in performance between M4 (+Pro/Max) and M5 (+Pro/Max)

Preliminary testing did not come to that conclusion.

> Apple’s New M5 Max Changes the Local AI Story

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XGe7ldwFLSE

Re: Can I run AI locally?

#85
This is kind of bogus since some of the S and A tier models are pretty useless for reasoning or tool calls and can’t run with any sizable system prompt… it seems to be solely based on tokens per second?

Re: Can I run AI locally?

#87

This seems to be estimating based on memory bandwidth / size of model, which is a really good estimate for dense models, but MoE models like GPT-OSS-20b don't involve the entire model for every token, so they can produce more tokens/second on the same hardware. GPT-OSS-20B has 3.6B active parameters, so it should perform similarly to a 3-4B dense model, while requiring enough VRAM to fit the whole 20B model. (In term…

I'm guessing this is also calculating based on the full context size that the model supports but depending on your use case it will be misleading. Even on a small consumer card with Qwen 3 30B-A3B you probably don't need 128K context depending on what you're doing so a smaller context and some tensor overrides will help. llama.cpp's llama-fit-params is helpful in those cases.

Re: Can I run AI locally?

#88
post #53

tbh i stopped caring about "can i run X locally" a while ago. for anything where quality matters (scripting, code, complex reasoning) the local models are just not there yet compared to API. where local shines is specific narrow tasks - TTS, embeddings, whisper for STT, stuff like that. trying to run a 70b model at 3 tok/s on your gaming GPU when you could just hit an API for like $0.002/req feels like a weird flex I…

[flagged]

Re: Can I run AI locally?

#89
This does not seem accurate based on my recently received M5 Max 128GB MBP. I think there's some estimates/guesswork involved, and it's also discounting that you can move the memory divider on Unified Memory devices like Apple Silicon and AMD AI Max 395+.
Post reply on HN