> With 81+ tools active, I see your problem.
“you’re holding it wrong” - ok, or we could make it better
MCP server that reduces Claude Code context consumption by 98%
81–90 of 119 posts
Re: MCP server that reduces Claude Code context consumption by 98%
#821. Can this help me? 2. How?
Thanks for sharing and building this.
Re: MCP server that reduces Claude Code context consumption by 98%
#83Compressing 153 git commits to 107 bytes means the LLM has to write the perfect extraction script before it can see the data. So if it writes a `git log --oneline | wc -l` when you needed specific commit messages, that information is gone.
The benchmarks assume the model always writes the right summarization code, which in practice it doesn't.
Re: MCP server that reduces Claude Code context consumption by 98%
#84A curious thing about the MCP protocol is it in theory supports alternative content types like binary ones. That has made me curious about shifting much of the data side of the MCP universe from text/json to Apache Arrow, and making agentic harnesses smarter about these just as we're doing in louie.
Re: MCP server that reduces Claude Code context consumption by 98%
#85The hooks seem too aggressive. Blocking all curl/wget/WebFetch and funneling everything through the sandbox for 56 KB snapshots sounds great, but not for curl api.example.com/health returning 200 bytes. Compressing 153 git commits to 107 bytes means the LLM has to write the perfect extraction script before it can see the data. So if it writes a `git log --oneline | wc -l` when you needed specific commit messages, tha…
Re: MCP server that reduces Claude Code context consumption by 98%
#86The FTS5 index approach here is right, but I'd push further: pure BM25 underperforms on tool outputs because they're a mix of structured data (JSON, tables, config) and natural language (comments, error messages, docstrings). Keyword matching falls apart on the structured half. I built a hybrid retriever for a similar problem, compressing a 15,800-file Obsidian vault into a searchable index for Claude Code. Stack is…
I suspect the obsessive note-taker crowd on HN would appreciate it too.
Re: MCP server that reduces Claude Code context consumption by 98%
#87Re: MCP server that reduces Claude Code context consumption by 98%
#88Re: MCP server that reduces Claude Code context consumption by 98%
#89> Bun auto-detected for 3–5x faster JS/TS execution
This is quite a claim, and even so, doesn't matter since the bottleneck is the LLM and not the JS interpreter. It's a nit, but little things like this just make the project look bad overall. It feels like nobody took the time to read the copy before publishing it.
More importantly, the claimed 98% context savings are noise without benchmarks of harness performance with and without "context mode".
I'm glad someone is working on this, but I just feel like this is not a serious solution to the problem.