Good article and I agree with everything in there. For my own voice agent I decided to make him PTT by default as the problems of the model accurately guessing the end of utterance are just too great. I think it can be solved in the future but, I haven't seen a really good example of it being done with modern day tech including this labs. Fundamentally it all comes down to the fact that different humans have differen…
It feels like this is one of those areas where the last 10% of polish will take 90% of the effort
Audio is the one area small labs are winning
81–90 of 109 posts
Re: Audio is the one area small labs are winning
#82[flagged]
(source: just look at their comment history)
Re: Audio is the one area small labs are winning
#83[flagged]
i don’t understand the point in farming comments with an LLM on a site like Hacker News. what’s the benefit here? (source: just look at their comment history)
Then you could help control the discussion if you coordinated up/downvotes/flag with your bots.
Re: Audio is the one area small labs are winning
#84Re: Audio is the one area small labs are winning
#85Re: Audio is the one area small labs are winning
#86Is there something that will read books to me? I.e I have some books in epub format and want audiobook versions for them, with a nice voice.
Re: Audio is the one area small labs are winning
#87It's amazing how good open-weight STT and TTS have gotten, so there's no need to pay for Wispr Flow, Superwhisper, Eleven-Labs etc. Sharing my setup in case it may be useful for others; it's especially useful when working with CLI agents like Code Code or Codex-CLI: STT: Hex [1] (open-source), with Parakeet V3 - stunningly fast, near-instant transcription. The slight accuracy drop relative to bigger models is immater…
Re: Audio is the one area small labs are winning
#88Earlier quoted context omitted.
We are *quickly* approaching a Tuesday where "bot detected, opinion rejected" is going to be a default assumption.
It's monday today so I approach we just have to wait for 24 hours for tomorrow. I do feel like AI has made us distrust each other at such a massive scale seen nothing like before. Previously there could still be bot-like comments but they were still written by human or so. Not anymore now and things are getting more sophisticated. I 100% believe that its possible to not have --. You are absolutely right and some othe…
For a very long time astroturfing was only viable over broadcast channels and [therefore] was expensive enough that only the really large corporations could afford to engage in the practice. With the advent of internet forums that could be arranged by any larger marketing agency and became available to any larger entity. With the advent of so called "user generated content" astroturfing really became easily accessible to any medium sized entity.
It has always been a race to the bottom. Reddit and Youtube are well known examples. If you follow any niche there whatsoever, you can easily (especially retroactively, because there's usually a ramp-up period) pinpoint a time where some astroturfing entity either launched a bot army or bought out mods/creators.
LLMs have dropped the cost of astroturfing to such a degree that not only it is now viable for any individual dropshipper to engage in the activity, locations with conversions previously too low to matter became viable attack targets. Everyone with several dozen euros and some hours to spare can now absolutely flood every corner of the internet without extremely strict authentication.
Some places are more resistant to astroturfing than others, though. I would suspect that if some few days old accounts started praising Foobarized in every possible thread here on HN the admins would ban this keyword quite quickly. One needs to be slow and careful. It requires pre-creating a bunch of accounts and leveling them up with some casual comments here and there so that when the actual astroturfing campaign starts (buyer not yet determined), the accounts are primed and are accepted as part of the community.
The internet is dead and has been for some time, it's just that we are too afraid to admit it to ourselves while actively seeking closed gardens of confirmed human-to-human communication.
Re: Audio is the one area small labs are winning
#89It's amazing how good open-weight STT and TTS have gotten, so there's no need to pay for Wispr Flow, Superwhisper, Eleven-Labs etc. Sharing my setup in case it may be useful for others; it's especially useful when working with CLI agents like Code Code or Codex-CLI: STT: Hex [1] (open-source), with Parakeet V3 - stunningly fast, near-instant transcription. The slight accuracy drop relative to bigger models is immater…
Re: Audio is the one area small labs are winning
#90Is there something that will read books to me? I.e I have some books in epub format and want audiobook versions for them, with a nice voice.
It has modern voices, but I prefer the robotic voice from 15 years ago because it's very patterned and predictable, which makes it easier to follow at super-fast speaking rates -- something closer to my visual reading rate.