Live data from Hacker News

Spain to ban social media access for under-16s, PM Sanchez says

reuters.com

81–90 of 113 posts

Re: Spain to ban social media access for under-16s, PM Sanchez says

#81
post #10

This is really globally coordinated, isn't it? I'm just not sure why now and not previously. Is it just that Twitter went over the toxicity threshold that everyone noticed?

Definitely tickles all kinds of conspiracy theory senses.

Of course it could just be law makers seeing one country do it and then going "wait, you can do that and people will go along with it???". I'm not sure if that's any better than a global conspiracy though.

Re: Spain to ban social media access for under-16s, PM Sanchez says

#82
post #72

They should just ban social media outright, regardless of age.

that's great idea until you will try to define what is social media - HN, Reddit, youtube, various PHPBB forums? so pretty much ban any human interaction online other than 101?

Not that hard. Ban any social media that has a personalized algorithmically generated feed. Those things can be gamed for engagement and are poisonous both to the individual and to society.

HN, Reddit, PHPBB forums would be excluded. There's no personalization outside the user control on those as far as I am aware.

Last time I used Reddit, I could aee the activity on the boards I was subscribed to, but anyone with the same subscriptions would see the same activity. There's o dark pattern there.

And just to be clear, I absolutely despise Reddit. I don't even like HN all that much to be frank. I would be the last person that would try to protect Reddit. I am just being coherent with my thoughts on the matter.

Re: Spain to ban social media access for under-16s, PM Sanchez says

#83

Governments everywhere are following suit.

In this case, saving the children from the toxic misinformation firehose that is social media might save our democracies.

A yes, we most protect others from being exposed to information that might make them vote differently from what we want. After all, democracy is all about getting the votes we want, right?

Re: Spain to ban social media access for under-16s, PM Sanchez says

#84
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In this case, saving the children from the toxic misinformation firehose that is social media might save our democracies.

The cynical in me doesnt see that as the main problem, lack of diversity in thought and debate is already an issue, censorship laws about what subjects and what opinions are correct is an issue that will be exacerbated. To save the democracies you need, a better population who votes in competently and informed, as well as a public debate that is honest and doesnt decry any deviation from the standard as fascism. Far-…

You can only have a democracy when the vote actually matters. In a representative democracy where representatives are not held accountable to their campaign promises that can hardly be said to be the case.

Re: Spain to ban social media access for under-16s, PM Sanchez says

#85
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Age verification is possible without revealing personally identifiable information (beyond old enough yes/no, which is not in any way personally identifiable info) and from my perspective should be a strict requirement with any such laws. In fact, if these laws make the requisite infrastructure (ID cards that offer that functionality) a hard requirement then creating an anonymous web that nevertheless has age checks…

It is not preemptive cynicism. My issue isn't with private corporations having access to my data, it's with my government having access to my social media profile.

How does that follow? I don’t see the connection.

Zero trust age verification means both sides don’t have to learn anything about each other beyond old enough yes/no. Should mean that.

I’m fine with age verification if it fulfills at least the same criteria that offline age verification does. When you show your ID card in a supermarket to buy alcohol or cigarettes or whatever then the government doesn’t learn anything about what you did and if the cashier doesn’t memorize and write down anything on the card the supermarket doesn’t learn anything about your identity. Here the digital solution can and should do better and close that theoretical deanonymization vector.

But yeah, that‘s the ideal to aspire to.

Re: Spain to ban social media access for under-16s, PM Sanchez says

#86
post #40
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You need ID to buy cigarettes and alcohol, prescription drugs or to get sim card... you will need it to register for social network account... do not seem as big of a deal to me. Even less when considering all the positives.

When I show my ID at the cash register I assume the person working there doesn’t instantaneously memorize all my details and then write down when exactly I was at the shop, along with other details, to use this info later for their own reasons. Whereas if I upload my ID to a tech company (that potentially answers to both my own government and foreign governments, as well as having its own ad-related agenda) I am a bi…

[deleted]

Re: Spain to ban social media access for under-16s, PM Sanchez says

#87
post #49
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Given the track record of both the country and other EU attempts (despite the existence of a zero trust verification framework) I am quite sure this will be used to de-anonymize users online, see UK.

Please, enlighten us on the track record of Spain. Because I really can't recall anything outrageous, and surely nothing on the level of surveilance existing in the UK.

Hacienda is the most extractive Tax Agency in the world. They have lobbied for ever more intrusion into private lifes of citizens in order to extract more money. Thus they have included a "lifestyle auditing" that has access to many cross-databases, utilities, insurance, etc....

If you set up a system of ID identification linked to your real ID and IP, Hacienda (and the police, and eventually private companies) will be able to backtrack.

The current PM's rother, wife and half of his cabinet are involved in corruption scandals linked to COVID funds given to companies that bribed people. This is the government that will implement such efforts. Would you be able to trust them ?

Re: Spain to ban social media access for under-16s, PM Sanchez says

#88
post #36
post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There it rears its ugly head again, the preemptive cynicism that prevents anything good from ever getting done. It’s simple really: zero trust age verification should be a strict requirement of any such law and anything else illegal for age verification. That to me is what has to happen and it’s important to me. That’s my perspective on this – not that‘s never going to happen anyway, so no point in trying to.

Its not preemptive, more like reactive, track record is bad and current PM is enshrouded in corruption, so do the maths.

Social media is toxic to kids (and adults, but that’s a different matter), extraordinary measures are called for, even with risks. It’s hyper optimized to be the equivalent of a drug, and should be regulated as such.

Re: Spain to ban social media access for under-16s, PM Sanchez says

#89

Seems easier to justify if social media owners are hanging out with child sex traffickers and enabling features that let you undress anyone who posts photos to the site.

If we follow that logic maybe some of the politicians that have created/voted for this would have liked a visit to that infamous island.

Could you expand on this as it makes no sense to me?

Re: Spain to ban social media access for under-16s, PM Sanchez says

#90
post #85

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It is not preemptive cynicism. My issue isn't with private corporations having access to my data, it's with my government having access to my social media profile.

How does that follow? I don’t see the connection. Zero trust age verification means both sides don’t have to learn anything about each other beyond old enough yes/no. Should mean that. I’m fine with age verification if it fulfills at least the same criteria that offline age verification does. When you show your ID card in a supermarket to buy alcohol or cigarettes or whatever then the government doesn’t learn anythin…

Will age verification require the use of software I can't view the source of and/or can't patch (due to remote attestation), and presumably only runs on user-hostile systems (Android with Google Services and iOS)?

It's hardly zero-trust in that case.

Post reply on HN