Live data from Hacker News

NY school phone ban has made lunch loud again

gothamist.com

81–90 of 352 posts

Re: NY school phone ban has made lunch loud again

#82
post #51

I'm guessing that teachers never wanted smartphones in class in the first place and that this was just about pushing back against the helicopter parents.

I'm out of school for 3 years. For most of the time smartphones existed, but were forbidden in class. It were the teachers, who allowed it and even encouraged it to be used in class. When the students are already staring at a screen during class, they continue doing so after. When they do not, they don't (at least initially). In my final years, it was obvious who thought about class and who was completely mind-absent, by looking who looked at an school-supplied iPad. > 90% of these people were just playing games during the whole lesson. This was known by everyone in the classroom and the teachers just ignored them.

Re: NY school phone ban has made lunch loud again

#83

A whole lot of people who got to their great tech jobs by commoditizing their screen addictions (I.e a significant amount of this very website) are massively harmed by these policies. I can’t believe that the folks here nearly universally like this. We should celebrate screen addiction and not fight it.

I learned to use a computer, by doing things that are possible air-gapped. Using a shell, etc. I did not by scrolling through social media, while all my peers treat computers like magic and lack basic knowledge, because they only know how to scroll through apps.

Even today I learn and produce the most when the network is down.

Re: NY school phone ban has made lunch loud again

#84
post #76

No more kids cameras in the classroom

This does nothing to ban cameras. The fact that a smartphone has a camera doesn't mean cameras are banned. You can still bring a standalone camera to school.

Which would cause a lot of questions if you pull it out in the classroom.

Re: NY school phone ban has made lunch loud again

#85

The ban will be revoked after Meta sues for business damages caused by unlawful government interference with their customer acquisition operations. /s

We need to sue Meta (et al.) for social damage caused by unlawful acquisition of addicts from the public education system. (My personal opinion)

Re: NY school phone ban has made lunch loud again

#86
post #44

Senior Raya Osagie, 16, said she has to “think more in class” because she used to Google answers or use artificial intelligence. “Now when we get computers, I actually have to [do] deep research instead of going straight to AI,” she said. This kind of blew my mind a bit, as I had always imagined AI being used to do homework, hadn't occurred to me it could be used during a class as well.

The insistence of people, in every era, on staying in a previous technology tier instead of reforming society and culture around the present ubiquitous technology, doesn't really make sense.

Re: NY school phone ban has made lunch loud again

#87
post #31

I don't think smartphones should be allowed in schools but as someone who was dumbfounded by the lunchtime cacophony of my peers, I wouldn't lead with that as a triumph.

Tech will prevail on the long term, even with these misguided bans.

The smartphone OSs hide all that "tech". They are not more educational (by themselves) than interactive advertisement streams.

Re: NY school phone ban has made lunch loud again

#88
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

it’s an america thing

Other countries don't have prefects? Wikipedia seems to indicate the phenomenon is worldwide. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Class_president

We wouldn't call such a thing a president, but yes.

Re: NY school phone ban has made lunch loud again

#89
post #69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because social media sites like Facebook literally said they're going to make the world better, by connecting more people and empowering more ideas. It was all bullshit of course, but people did believe it, myself included. Just 15 years ago the outlook of social media was much more optimistic.

> Just 15 years ago the outlook of social media was much more optimistic. Those who forget Usenet are doomed to repeat it, I suppose. > It was all bullshit of course Or, more likely, what was dreamed of ended up being incorrect. Like we learn every time we try social media, people don't actually want to be social online. That takes work and the vast majority of people don't want to spend their free time doing work. T…

Can you provide an example of where facebook tried to do what most people would consider good that also required any >1% kind of sacrifice or risk on their part? My impression is their moto was win at any cost and ask forgiveness later (not because we mean that either but because it will reduce the legal penalties and make us look like normal humans.) In some ways watching Mark reminds me of the infamous cigarette cartel testifying.

Re: NY school phone ban has made lunch loud again

#90
post #44

Senior Raya Osagie, 16, said she has to “think more in class” because she used to Google answers or use artificial intelligence. “Now when we get computers, I actually have to [do] deep research instead of going straight to AI,” she said. This kind of blew my mind a bit, as I had always imagined AI being used to do homework, hadn't occurred to me it could be used during a class as well.

The insistence of people, in every era, on staying in a previous technology tier instead of reforming society and culture around the present ubiquitous technology, doesn't really make sense.

Are you saying that reading comprehension is an outdated technology?
Post reply on HN