Earlier quoted context omitted.
GNOME essentially gutted itself when it switched away from GNOME 2. Somehow they still stuck around as a broken default. Go figure. IIRC, then a lot of documentation still mentions GNOME first and then KDE second. Furthermore, Ubuntu without the prefix is GNOME. Kubuntu is KDE. And all the others like Lubuntu, etc. all seem "special" to casual users. Think of what the average university student installs in a VM, when…
> And GNOME lives on as a sorry excuse for a bad copy of MacOS desktop looks without the feel. This is an inaccurate description. GNOME is a copy of (the worst parts of) Windows 8 and Mac OS, not just Mac OS. But seriously, GNOME isn't that bad, and there are people who genuinely enjoy it over KDE. Choice is what makes the Linux ecosystem great. However, I do agree that KDE is probably a saner default than GNOME, if…
I hope in the future KDE overtakes GNOME to become the "standard linux" experience.