Ghostty is awesome and I almost dropped iTerm for it until I hit cmd-f and nothing happened. https://github.com/ghostty-org/ghostty/issues?q=is%3Aissue%2...
I wonder what people would discuss in all these ghostty posts if cmd-f had been present from the start. It’s getting a little boring hearing about it in every post! There’s interesting things to discuss here about LLM tooling and approaches to coding. But of course we’d rather complain about cmd-f ;)
Vibing a non-trivial Ghostty feature
81–90 of 160 posts
Re: Vibing a non-trivial Ghostty feature
#82Welp, that explains it. I haven't changed terminal in a while anyway...
Re: Vibing a non-trivial Ghostty feature
#83Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not sure exactly what you're referring to, but I'm guessing it may be this interview I did 2 years ago: https://youtu.be/rysgxl35EGc?t=214 (timestamp linked to LLM-relevant section) I'm genuinely curious because I don't quite remember saying the quote you're saying I did. I'm not denying it, but I'd love to know more of the context. :) But, if it is the interview from 2 years ago, it revolved more around autocomplete…
It was this one: https://sourcegraph.com/blog/dev-tool-time-mitchell-hashimot... They even used the quote as the title of the accompanying blog post. As I say, I didn’t mean this as a gotcha or anything- I totally agree with the change and I have done similarly. I’ve always disabled autocomplete, tool tips, suggestions etc but now I am actively using Cursor daily.
Yeah this is from 2021 (!!!) and is directly related to LSPs. ChatGPT didn't even get launched until Nov 2022. So I think the quote doesn't really work in the context of today, it's literally from an era where I was looking at faster horses when cars were right around the corner and I had not a damn clue. Hah.
Off topic: I still dislike [most] LSPs and don't use them.
Re: Vibing a non-trivial Ghostty feature
#84Tip: I very often use AI for inspiration. In this case, I ended up keeping a lot (not all) of the UI code it made, but I will very often prompt an agent, throw away everything it did, and redo it myself (manually!). I find the "zero to one" stage of creation very difficult and time consuming and AI is excellent at being my muse. This right here is the single biggest win for coding agents. I see and directionally agre…
Re: Vibing a non-trivial Ghostty feature
#85Re: Vibing a non-trivial Ghostty feature
#86Earlier quoted context omitted.
Mitchell included a photograph of his breakfast preparation, and the bacon was curling up on the frying pan.
These are great and everybody should own a bunch of them. https://www.thechefspress.com/
Re: Vibing a non-trivial Ghostty feature
#87Re: Vibing a non-trivial Ghostty feature
#88Re: Vibing a non-trivial Ghostty feature
#89Re: Vibing a non-trivial Ghostty feature
#90Earlier quoted context omitted.
Real subtle. Why not just write "there are good programmers and bad programmers and AI is good for bad programmers and only bad programmers"? Think about what you just said about Mitchell Hashimoto here.
I'm not sure that's a fair take. I don't think it's an unfair statement that LLM-generated code typically is not very good - you can work with it and set up enough guard rails and guidance and whatnot that it can start to produce decent code, but out of the box, speed is definitely the selling point. They're basically junior interns. If you consider an engineer's job to be writing code, sure, you could read OP's post…
No, I think my response was fair, if worded sharply. I stand by it.