Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Divshot

divshot.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

81–90 of 113 posts

Re: Divshot

#81

Post by markdotto »

mbleigh wrote: post #79
markdotto wrote: post #77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Bootstrap creator here. * .navbar is for positioning/sizing. * .navbar-inner is required for the gradient because `overflow: visible;` is not respected by IE when `filter` is present. * .container is for centering the content within the navbar No idea what .navbar-content is—that's not part of the Bootstrap navbar component. We also use a `ul.nav`, not `div.nav`. So, close to the core, but not 100%.

Hey Mark, you're right on every count. The div.nav is a mistake that I thought I had fixed already, as for the rest let's just say it'll be fixed post-haste. Obviously we're HUGE fans of Bootstrap over at Divshot :)

No worries, and we appreciate you being fans :). Just wanted to let you know, and I figured you're attention would be here anyway.

Re: Divshot

#82

Post by Travis »

jakejohnson wrote: post #11
cadab wrote: post #4

Any chance for some invites? I'd love to try.

We'll be reviewing comments here throughout the day and if we can easily find your email you might receive an early invite!

A little late to the party, I'd love one too though. Signed up for the beta invite on the site with leleu ~atsign~ industrialinterface ~dot~ com

Thanks!

Re: Divshot

#83

Post by WayneDB »

mbleigh wrote: post #50
WayneDB wrote: post #49

Please make this a downloadable app that I can run on my desktop, if it's not already (I can't tell yet). I will never "sign in" to use a dev tool and I'm certainly not alone.

So I take it you're not a GitHub user? :) Desktop/downloadable version is on the horizon but not our first focus.

The GitHub analogy doesn't seem to fit. I can continue to use git regardless of whether GitHub is up, down or sideways.

I'm glad to hear that a downloadable version is on the horizon though! Thank You.

Re: Divshot

#84

Post by cancelbubble »

What about integrating something like jQuery UI where you could add interactions and widgets? Something as simple as a date picker to something like dragable/dropable/resize components

Re: Divshot

#86

Post by dmauro »

This looks really exciting. This seems more like what I wanted easel.io to be. I had actually started working on a simple html/css in-browser editor to use for mocks that could be taken into production, but looks like this might be what I was looking for.

Re: Divshot

#87

Post by jatinder »

jakejohnson wrote: post #11
cadab wrote: post #4

Any chance for some invites? I'd love to try.

We'll be reviewing comments here throughout the day and if we can easily find your email you might receive an early invite!

Oh, I can't wait to try it. any chance I could get an invite? email: "jatinder" + ".saundh" AT gmail dot com

Re: Divshot

#88

Post by shaloo »

jakejohnson wrote: post #11
cadab wrote: post #4

Any chance for some invites? I'd love to try.

We'll be reviewing comments here throughout the day and if we can easily find your email you might receive an early invite!

This is awesome! I'd love to get access. singh.shaloo gmail com

Re: Divshot

#89

Post by SchizoDuckie »

mbleigh wrote: post #71
SchizoDuckie wrote: post #67

Looks very nice, but i will never use something like this as SAS. This needs to be downloadable and embeddable in a private product (like a CKeditor), otherwise i'd never use it.

Could you explain a little more why you feel that way?

First and foremost, dependencies.

My apps cannot have third party services that it relies on. that would give too much problems with our own SLA's. If the SAS goes down, you are responsible.

Second: my stuff needs to be able work offline (at least o some degree) :)

Re: Divshot

#90

Post by SchizoDuckie »

jakejohnson wrote: post #72
SchizoDuckie wrote: post #67

Looks very nice, but i will never use something like this as SAS. This needs to be downloadable and embeddable in a private product (like a CKeditor), otherwise i'd never use it.

The editor itself is completely static HTML and written in CoffeeScript/Spine which gives us a lot of flexibility. We're exploring different opportunities for integration and possibly a downloadable version.

Sounds great! Cannot wait to see some source.
Post reply on HN