I switched to kitty after a periodic assessment of my user environment. Turns out, of modern terminal emulators, only Kitty is under a copyleft license. Considering, most of them are pretty capable and competitive, this was enough to switch. What I don't like: - No remote terminal persistence solution in the works + termux/screen incompatibility. - Two modes of font rendering and both are meh. Legacy is uneven and ja…
Kitty – GPU based terminal emulator
81–87 of 87 posts
Re: Kitty – GPU based terminal emulator
#82Is it really that hard to add Windows support for these terminal projects? I understand they are more valued in Linux circles but it's not like nobody on Windows is using the terminal.
I am really happy with https://wezterm.org/
Re: Kitty – GPU based terminal emulator
#83Is it really that hard to add Windows support for these terminal projects? I understand they are more valued in Linux circles but it's not like nobody on Windows is using the terminal.
I asked the same question for years but then Windows Terminal appears out of no where and is a real godsend. https://github.com/microsoft/terminal
Re: Kitty – GPU based terminal emulator
#84Re: Kitty – GPU based terminal emulator
#85Kovid is sort of an arrogant douchebag https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8213946
If the most recent example is from 2011, maybe it's not true anymore?
Re: Kitty – GPU based terminal emulator
#86Earlier quoted context omitted.
If the most recent example is from 2011, maybe it's not true anymore?
https://0x0.st/KBiB.png https://0x0.st/KBiM.png https://0x0.st/8SqV.png https://0x0.st/KBie.png https://0x0.st/8Sq4.png
Re: Kitty – GPU based terminal emulator
#87Earlier quoted context omitted.
https://0x0.st/KBiB.png https://0x0.st/KBiM.png https://0x0.st/8SqV.png https://0x0.st/KBie.png https://0x0.st/8Sq4.png
Accessing any of those shows stack backtrace of a null-pointer dereference in fhost.c on line 139.
That stack trace is fake btw, just means 404.