Live data from Hacker News

What's New with Firefox 142

mozilla.org

81–90 of 139 posts

Re: What's New with Firefox 142

#81
post #66

Anecdotally but Firefox has become slower and slower in the past few years for me. I have no idea what is going on behind the scene but it's getting nearly unusable. Tried Edge yesterday and it was so much faster, but the amount of ads pushing is yikes.

https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/firefox-cant-load-websi...

Not sure if this is what you're experiencing but I don't have IPV6 and this was causing a number of issues for me. Firefox has been so much better since disabling this.

Re: What's New with Firefox 142

#82
post #55
post #32

Lately, I’ve experienced memory leaks in Firefox that I’m too amateur to diagnose, that leads to Firefox eating 8gb of memory in some web renderer process. So when I excitedly check the changelog hoping for a summary of possible changes, I’m disappointed that there isn’t a verbose changelog for advanced users. I’m sure I could search bugzilla, but it makes me sad that the only “important” things are the headlining fe…

I've used firefox for 15+ years, but it starting to bug me too much. Memory issues, forced restarts that block navigation (wth!), clutter all around, having to disable sponsored crap, and random incompatibilities are starting to take a toll. I've been falling back to Edge for crying out loud.

> forced restarts that block navigation (wth!)

From what I understand, this is because the OS package manager changed some of Firefox's files in a background update (Ubuntu does this through unattended-upgrades), and Firefox's built-in updater doesn't have this problem.

Re: What's New with Firefox 142

#84
post #68

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm still ambivalent on the rest of the AI features, but the AI translation is absolutely amazing . The translation quality isn't perfect, but being able to seamlessly translate 20+ languages 100% locally is amazing.

The models[0] are open and great, I find them so useful that I ended up making an Android app[1] just to have them available also outside of Firefox. [0]: https://github.com/mozilla/firefox-translations-models/ [1]: https://github.com/davidventura/firefox-translator

That translation app is so cool, exactly what I've always been looking for (offline + camera integration + clean UI). Thanks for putting in the work and for putting it on F-Droid even!

Re: What's New with Firefox 142

#85
post #54
post #32

Lately, I’ve experienced memory leaks in Firefox that I’m too amateur to diagnose, that leads to Firefox eating 8gb of memory in some web renderer process. So when I excitedly check the changelog hoping for a summary of possible changes, I’m disappointed that there isn’t a verbose changelog for advanced users. I’m sure I could search bugzilla, but it makes me sad that the only “important” things are the headlining fe…

When trying to diagnose performance or memory issues with a browser, always start with the installed and enabled extensions.

These days, I'd say always start with the YouTube tabs.

Re: What's New with Firefox 142

#86

I wonder if it addressed something practical and meaningful...like implementing a spell check that at least covers all of the English language. Maybe then they can start working on the 5 year trek to also make the spellchecker somewhat competent. Or maybe we'll just keep packing features, because everyone here knows, features are what save products! Not usability!

At this speed Ladybird might be the browser to use in a couple years, even though I find their decision to use a memory unsafe language for their core tech foolish in the year 2025.

Re: What's New with Firefox 142

#87
post #85
post #54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

When trying to diagnose performance or memory issues with a browser, always start with the installed and enabled extensions.

These days, I'd say always start with the YouTube tabs.

Youtube is just hopelessly broken on Firefox/Linux anyways. Half the time the home page doesn't even load.

Re: What's New with Firefox 142

#88

I wonder if it addressed something practical and meaningful...like implementing a spell check that at least covers all of the English language. Maybe then they can start working on the 5 year trek to also make the spellchecker somewhat competent. Or maybe we'll just keep packing features, because everyone here knows, features are what save products! Not usability!

At this speed Ladybird might be the browser to use in a couple years, even though I find their decision to use a memory unsafe language for their core tech foolish in the year 2025.

I remember the original reasoning for creating Firefox (first Phoenix) was to create a more lightweight and faster version of the Mozilla browser, which initially was true.

Re: What's New with Firefox 142

#90
post #64

I'm genuinely perplexed why people find link previews useful. The page image is too small to really see, and it's not as if rapidly opening and closing a tab actually takes effort. It may be faster than the long click depending how comfortable you are with keyboard controls. I have other questions as well -- does the link preview ignore your plugins? So if you loaded the web page, would uBlock Origin prevent tracking…

>> it's not as if rapidly opening and closing a tab actually takes effort. It may be faster than the long click depending how comfortable you are with keyboard controls. For normal people, i.e. those who aren't techies, you have your answer right there on why this may be useful. We are very efficient with our browser usage. Normal people struggle with this task because they get lost in the steps. Even if they can do…

Eh, isn't it even quicker without keyboard? Third button opens in New tab, third button again closes the tab.

But you're point is correct that the majority of people do indeed not use any device quickly. No matter wherever it's a phone or desktop browser.

Post reply on HN