Live data from Hacker News

Meta's Vision for Superintelligence

meta.com

81–90 of 184 posts

Re: Meta's Vision for Superintelligence

#81
post #33

The art of writing so many words without communicating anything useful.

Written by meta.ai

But at least he’s trying to signal benevolence. People getting trapped into their projected image is a thing, so in this day and age I’m going to take this as a win.

Re: Meta's Vision for Superintelligence

#82
If Meta invents superhuman AI and Mark gets to own it, we'll effectively enter the era of Antichrist. Imagine a human as greedy, as capable and as hollow as Mark, but made 1000x smarter than anyone else on the planet? Corporations are kept in check by competition between them, they can't be too abusive, but this brittle balance will end if one of them creates AI.

Re: Meta's Vision for Superintelligence

#84
> If trends continue, then you'd expect people to spend less time in productivity software, and more time creating and connecting.

Sorry, but Jevon's Paradox[1] returns yet again.

If you make workers more efficient, then we won't be freed up to spend more time creating and connecting. There will be more work.

Creating more efficient steam engines didn't reduce coal consumption, it just made there be more steam engines. The second order effects of efficiency don 't work the way we think they work.

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jevons_paradox

Re: Meta's Vision for Superintelligence

#87
post #45

This stuff is naive. There's a bunch of people who want a large income (wealth) disparity, and they will fight to preserve it unless you give them an equivalent station in the 'new world'. But you will still need to sustain ex-workers if they can't get normal jobs, and those same people at the top will not tolerate the taxes required to sustain a basic level of living for much wider population. They already can't tol…

Last time I commented on Zuck on HN I got a warning. That said, this stuff confirms for the 100th time that he is out of touch with reality. Perhaps that’s why he wanted to make VR work so badly. I think he might try to change Co’s name again since Meta doesn’t fit the bill anymore. How about they buy Intel and reverse merge just for the name?

> he might try to change Co’s name again since Meta doesn’t fit the bill anymore.

If so, the logical choice would be to change the name from "Meta" to "AGI".

Re: Meta's Vision for Superintelligence

#88

Facebook / Meta and Mark in particular are an amazing case of someone who is, at least at this point, incapable of learning from past mistakes, or even recognizing the mistakes they have made and are continuing to make. Facebook's mission of "connecting the world" turned out to be the absolute worst thing anyone should ever try to do. Humans are social creatures, yes, but every connection we make costs energy to main…

> that means we are actually incapable of treating each other as people on the Internet

Well, that's because there aren't people on the internet! I mean, yes, us technologists understand that there are often people pulling knobs and levers behind the scenes as an implementation detail, so technically they are there. But they are only implementation details, not what makes it what it is. If you replaced the implementation with another algorithm that functions just as well, nobody would notice. In that sense, it is just software.

> leading to the rise of toxicity and much, much worse.

It is not so much that it has lead to anything different, but that those who used to be in the forest yelling at animals as if they were human moved into civilized areas when they started yelling at computers as if they were human. That has taken their mental disorders to where it is much more visible.

Re: Meta's Vision for Superintelligence

#89

This stuff is naive. There's a bunch of people who want a large income (wealth) disparity, and they will fight to preserve it unless you give them an equivalent station in the 'new world'. But you will still need to sustain ex-workers if they can't get normal jobs, and those same people at the top will not tolerate the taxes required to sustain a basic level of living for much wider population. They already can't tol…

>There's a bunch of people who want a large income (wealth) disparity Apart form you of course, so I'm sure you'd be ok if the government would tax your higher than average tech wage till your take home pay would match that of a train conductor's or bus driver's, like in Western Europe, and therefore fix the wage gap you hate so much. Would you like that solution? Caption this: It's only a problem when the people who…

> the government would tax your higher than average tech wage till your take home pay would match that of a train conductor's or bus driver's, like in Western Europe

I live in Europe and earn ca. 6 times more than my friend who is a bus driver in the same city. We both have access to free education and, if we wish, also free healthcare, for which I am paying slightly more, but I really don't mind.

Re: Meta's Vision for Superintelligence

#90
post #45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Last time I commented on Zuck on HN I got a warning. That said, this stuff confirms for the 100th time that he is out of touch with reality. Perhaps that’s why he wanted to make VR work so badly. I think he might try to change Co’s name again since Meta doesn’t fit the bill anymore. How about they buy Intel and reverse merge just for the name?

> he might try to change Co’s name again since Meta doesn’t fit the bill anymore. If so, the logical choice would be to change the name from "Meta" to "AGI".

I was thinking they buy Intel and say “we are going to make Intel super. SuperIntel.” Zuck seems to like the term superintelligence over AGI.
Post reply on HN