I just tried this with the Firefox setting recommended in the article, with and without a VPN, and it still recognised me. Any other tips?
Did you restart Firefox after enabling the setting?
Web fingerprinting is worse than I thought (2023)
81–90 of 219 posts
Re: Web fingerprinting is worse than I thought (2023)
#82Re: Web fingerprinting is worse than I thought (2023)
#83Earlier quoted context omitted.
Seems almost impossible to police though.
Since fingerprinting is mostly client side, it should be detectable. If you serve a web page with a fingerprinting script, that should be an automatic big fine.
The unsolvable problem is that modern websites are not simply documents but rather full-blown software with web browsers their runtime environments, and you simply cannot enable that amount of power without also enabling the power to fingerprint that runtime environment and thus fingerprint the user.
Re: Web fingerprinting is worse than I thought (2023)
#84> go to about:config and setting privacy.resistFingerprinting = true in your Firefox browser Two questions jump to mind: Why isn't this the default in Firefox? What is the downside? I.e., what can break by enabling this parameter?
The most obvious downside for me was remote terminal windows (e.g. using ttyd) being unusable because canvas rendering was "broken".
I've had more issues personally with resist fingerprinting making major sites completely unusable (drupal.com, walmart.com..)
Re: Web fingerprinting is worse than I thought (2023)
#85This isn't exactly browser fingerprinting (though it may involve browser fingerprinting.) But the biggest open question I have right now is: what is Meta doing to get around Apple's iOS privacy protections? A couple of years ago, Apple launched App Tracking Transparency as a way to reduce tracking across their iOS app ecosystem. People predicted that this would be devastating for companies like Meta and Snap, and it…
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44169115 They found sneaky ways on Android. There is no way they aren't trying to do so on iOS. One must always assume malice with anything Meta.
Re: Web fingerprinting is worse than I thought (2023)
#86This isn't exactly browser fingerprinting (though it may involve browser fingerprinting.) But the biggest open question I have right now is: what is Meta doing to get around Apple's iOS privacy protections? A couple of years ago, Apple launched App Tracking Transparency as a way to reduce tracking across their iOS app ecosystem. People predicted that this would be devastating for companies like Meta and Snap, and it…
A strong relationship to Apple and cross-value marketing.
Surely these rules only apply to middle sized and smaller companies. We've seen Apple get caught bending the rules for big players, even if they don't admit it.
Re: Web fingerprinting is worse than I thought (2023)
#87Re: Web fingerprinting is worse than I thought (2023)
#88Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes by a lot.
This comes with some downside because to protect privacy Safari blocks some useful APIs. For example, you can't tell if the user is running Apple silicon or Intel. That means you have to ask them whether they want the Intel or Apple silicon version of a download. This is a non-trivial question for a lot of Mac users. And, sure, you can always publish through the App store but that comes with its own drawbacks.
Re: Web fingerprinting is worse than I thought (2023)
#89I'm considering it a good thing at this point that I'm getting captcha-walled with increasing frequency. It means that my setup and behavior looks more like the billions of anonymous bots flooding the web rather than a lucrative mark.
Re: Web fingerprinting is worse than I thought (2023)
#90I'm considering it a good thing at this point that I'm getting captcha-walled with increasing frequency. It means that my setup and behavior looks more like the billions of anonymous bots flooding the web rather than a lucrative mark.
You should share details on your setup.