Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm unsure whether it is me, but one of us is confused about the representation of a 2D image with a 3D scene. it's absolutely correct that a digital (2d) image is a grid of pixels. We can call it a soup if you want. An audio file, our text document are soups too. A 3D scene (the digital representation) is structure that can't be reduced to a simple grid. At least it better not to or it wouldn't look great from almos…
> I'm unsure whether it is me, but one of us is confused about the representation of a 2D image with a 3D scene. it's absolutely correct that a digital (2d) image is a grid of pixels. We can call it a soup if you want. An audio file, our text document are soups too. No, I don't agree that images or audio files or text documents are soups, they're ordered grids or lists of equidistant samples. To be clear, I didn't ma…
And thank you for the extra notes surrounding the divergence. I had not read the original paper (again that is) before shooting my personal interpretation, and poor recollection of what the paper said. I should read it again I may not recognize it.
I haven't read the paper you shared yet. I thank you again for your input plus the couple of refs gave me plenty to spend time scratching my head as something must be just wrong with my current understanding.