Live data from Hacker News

Crew-9 Returns to Earth

spacex.com

81–90 of 712 posts

Re: Crew-9 Returns to Earth

#81
post #75

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don’t understand this take? They got to spend the better part of a year doing what they love. Sounds pretty kick-ass to me.

We’ll see if they fly again or they are done with space for good. There is no way they’ll publicly complain or acknowledge issues. as it will look unprofessional, but actions will tell.

This was likely their last mission to start with. They’re already past prime and nearing retirement (of official astronaut duties, at least).

Re: Crew-9 Returns to Earth

#82
The drone footage is absolutely amazing (as compared to any other camera angle from the recovery boat where you would expect to have better quality but was actually awful). I had trouble, for a moment, believing that it was not CGIed.

Is there any information about what drone/camera equipment was used?

Re: Crew-9 Returns to Earth

#83
post #75

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don’t understand this take? They got to spend the better part of a year doing what they love. Sounds pretty kick-ass to me.

We’ll see if they fly again or they are done with space for good. There is no way they’ll publicly complain or acknowledge issues. as it will look unprofessional, but actions will tell.

Wasn't this (or rather, the original short mission) expected to likely be the last mission for them anyways, due to age?

I really hope they'll at some point clearly say either "well, of course we missed our families, but really, getting such an opportunity was AWESOME and Boeing's misfortune was a huge lucky event for us" or "Being up there is awesome, but quite honestly, having to do it unexpectedly really sucked".

And I don't think that it is the slightest bit unprofessional to have feelings about where you spent a year of your life, or to talk about those feelings.

Re: Crew-9 Returns to Earth

#84

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They were scheduled to stay there for 8 days and had Boeing's vessel proven flight worthy, they would have returned after 8 days. The messaging beyond that was just political in nature. They could have been rescued, but were left on the station until after the election. The situation resulted in significant issues for the next crewing [1] leading to some interesting things like the first time a Russian cosmonaut was…

> They could have been rescued, but were left on the station until after the election This continues to be silly. There were changes to Crew 9, last summer , when it was decided that it would be logistically easier for two (instead of four) astronauts to go up and the two Boeing crew would come down with them on the Crew 9 craft in February/March 2025 (that would be now). This has always been the plan, the only polit…

I would like to see the qualifications of the people who disagree with that decision before I waste time listening to them.

Re: Crew-9 Returns to Earth

#85

The drone footage is absolutely amazing (as compared to any other camera angle from the recovery boat where you would expect to have better quality but was actually awful). I had trouble, for a moment, believing that it was not CGIed. Is there any information about what drone/camera equipment was used?

It won't play for me. Has it been uploaded anywhere else?

Re: Crew-9 Returns to Earth

#86

Eric Berger has a good summary on the narrative: https://arstechnica.com/space/2025/03/can-nasa-remain-nonpar...

Berger is an excellent journalist. He’s very knowledgeable about space topics, has good sources, and has been extremely fair to Musk in the past.

When he says it’s a “throne of lies”, a line has been crossed.

Re: Crew-9 Returns to Earth

#87
post #86

Eric Berger has a good summary on the narrative: https://arstechnica.com/space/2025/03/can-nasa-remain-nonpar...

Berger is an excellent journalist. He’s very knowledgeable about space topics, has good sources, and has been extremely fair to Musk in the past. When he says it’s a “throne of lies”, a line has been crossed.

What line?

Re: Crew-9 Returns to Earth

#88

Eric Berger has a good summary on the narrative: https://arstechnica.com/space/2025/03/can-nasa-remain-nonpar...

The topic is "crew returns to Earth" not arstechnica's routine political spin.

Does arstechnica mention the dolphins even once? Nope. How about Trump? Six times! Meanwhile, sibling comment applauds the writer for his "knowledge of space topics".

Re: Crew-9 Returns to Earth

#89
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Feels more like getting an extended vacation getting to do the coolest thing you can do as a human.

I’m not sure it’s considered a vacation if you didn’t plan on staying 34x the number of days you had originally planned, or have a choice to leave. Especially when you’re separated from your family and other loved ones.

When you are strapping to a rocket the plan is that you explode into lots of little pieces. Getting there and back alive is a bonus.

Re: Crew-9 Returns to Earth

#90
post #75

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We’ll see if they fly again or they are done with space for good. There is no way they’ll publicly complain or acknowledge issues. as it will look unprofessional, but actions will tell.

Wasn't this (or rather, the original short mission) expected to likely be the last mission for them anyways, due to age? I really hope they'll at some point clearly say either "well, of course we missed our families, but really, getting such an opportunity was AWESOME and Boeing's misfortune was a huge lucky event for us" or "Being up there is awesome, but quite honestly, having to do it unexpectedly really sucked".…

> And I don't think that it is the slightest bit unprofessional to have feelings about where you spent a year of your life, or to talk about those feelings.

I think it’s cultural. Astronauts I think are more disciplined and more professional on average than an average Joe. Even if they hated it they probably wouldn’t mention it publicly. Maybe after they retire from NASA completely.

Post reply on HN