Live data from Hacker News

The College-Cost Calamity

economist.com

81–83 of 83 posts

Re: The College-Cost Calamity

#81
post #76

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Co-op program. And networking. A lot of companies see RIT as a huge talent pool, and dedicate quite a bit of recruiting resources to look for potential interns and full-timers. Plus, you'll find peers that you can use to develop your professional network.

>A lot of companies see RIT as a huge talent pool, and dedicate quite a bit of recruiting resources to look for potential interns and full-timers. Plus, you'll find peers that you can use to develop your professional network. That's too much money to spend on a technical degree. You could make the argument Harvard or Yale is worth that kind of money because your contacts are with people who are going to be senators a…

> way too much money for what you're going to get.

YMMV.

Re: The College-Cost Calamity

#82
post #80

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Disagree. You can be wildly successful by just hustling. I am.

Your top end is limited unless you start your own company.

Not true. Join a startup. Or better yet, learn how to sell yourself. You'll never need a degree if you can sell your passion.

Re: The College-Cost Calamity

#83
The most relevant question is "whether the college experience (including life experiences and consequent employment value) is worth the attached price tag?" It's one thing when you are paying $5,000 per semester, but at $40,000 per year for 4 years? Unless those 4 years leads to an positive cash flow of $10,000 per year thereafter to repay this debt, I just don't see the rationality of paying so much for non-incoming producing B.S./B.A. degrees (biology, psychology, sociology, languages, etc.).
Post reply on HN