Live data from Hacker News

Ghostty 1.0

ghostty.org

81–90 of 719 posts

Re: Ghostty 1.0

#81

Ghostty has a hard-to-find "quake mode" that may interest some. During the beta I had it configured like this on macOS: keybind = global:cmd+space=toggle_quick_terminal quick-terminal-animation-duration = 0.1 There isn't an option to set the default height of the "quick terminal" window that I'm aware of but you can drag the bottom of the window after it opens and it will persist between toggles.

Thank you! First thing I was looking for too. Cannot imagine trying a terminal without this.

Re: Ghostty 1.0

#82
post #5

I'm very excited to have this because it's the first bit of high quality open source software to hit the streets in a while. I like where we're headed with tools like this and Ladybird[0] for hope of a subscriptionless future. Thank you, Mitchell! [0] https://ladybird.org/

> I like where we're headed with tools like this and Ladybird[0] for hope of a subscriptionless future. That's a weird statement. I've been running a free, open-source and subscription-less browser (firefox) and terminal emulator (many) for close to 20 years. Actually I like what ladybird is doing in the browser space, given firefox is quite dependent on google cash. But this is just yet another terminal emulator in…

Your rebuttal is not mutually exclusive to the parent comment. They say it’s the first _new_ such thing in a while, not that there aren’t any in existence.

Re: Ghostty 1.0

#83
post #40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I like where we're headed with tools like this and Ladybird[0] for hope of a subscriptionless future. That's a weird statement. I've been running a free, open-source and subscription-less browser (firefox) and terminal emulator (many) for close to 20 years. Actually I like what ladybird is doing in the browser space, given firefox is quite dependent on google cash. But this is just yet another terminal emulator in…

native UI is so much more than how a border of a window looks like.

[deleted]

Re: Ghostty 1.0

#84
post #19

I've been using Ghostty for several months now (used Alacritty before that). Ghostty is really, really good. It's fast, it gets the text rendering right (many cross-platform terminals struggle with this), and it has all the features I need. It's also some very well-written Zig code. We use some of the code for graphemes in Bun for `Bun.stringWidth`.

Likewise coming from alacritty myself. This out of the box gives me everything I really want and does it well. Not to mention the development process was quite refreshing to see. Decision making process for sane defaults and to allow customization quite easily.

Nicely done.

Re: Ghostty 1.0

#85
Overall nice, but I'm bummed to be running into some bugs regarding a few key binding assignments. Though, I could just be missing something due to the somewhat spartan docs.

Given all the time and hype, I'd have hoped that wrinkles like this would've been ironed out by launch time.

Back to Wezterm for now, but I'll certainly be checking back in at some point.

Re: Ghostty 1.0

#86

Ghostty got a lot of hype (I cover this in my reflection below), but I want to make sure I call out that there is a good group of EXCELLENT terminals out there, and I'm not claiming Ghostty is strictly better than any of them. Ghostty has different design goals and tradeoffs and if it's right for you great, but if not, you have so many good choices. Shout out to Kitty, WezTerm, Foot in particular. iTerm2 gets some ha…

Just make sure not to get caught in the pitfall that is maximum render speed, which can lead to missing out on efficiency during slow and partial rendering. Missing damage tracking, always painting everything (even when the window is a full 4k monitor), etc. kills performance and input latency when dealing with realistic redraw workloads like text editing, blinking cursors and progress bars. Much too often to termina…

Right, input latency is what matters for me. I'm not seeing whether they've measured that in the docs/on Github.

Re: Ghostty 1.0

#88

Ghostty got a lot of hype (I cover this in my reflection below), but I want to make sure I call out that there is a good group of EXCELLENT terminals out there, and I'm not claiming Ghostty is strictly better than any of them. Ghostty has different design goals and tradeoffs and if it's right for you great, but if not, you have so many good choices. Shout out to Kitty, WezTerm, Foot in particular. iTerm2 gets some ha…

For those interested, the link below from Mitchell's blog explains the different goals he's trying to reach, compared to other terminal emulators.

https://mitchellh.com/writing/ghostty-is-coming

Re: Ghostty 1.0

#89

The little it says about what this even is seems to be wrong. This is not cross-platform at all

Windows is a third class citizen when it comes to the development world.
Post reply on HN