Live data from Hacker News

OpenAI completes deal that values company at $157B

nytimes.com

81–90 of 443 posts

Re: OpenAI completes deal that values company at $157B

#81

$157B marketcap means they need to 20x their current revenue of roughly 400 million dollars by next year... But the revenue has flatlined and you can't raise your existing users cost by 20x... It truly is a mystery as to how anybody throwing other peoples money hopes to get it back from OpenAI

[deleted]

Re: OpenAI completes deal that values company at $157B

#82
post #4

Given the high risk, investors likely want a shot of earning at least a 10x return. $157 billion x 10 = $1.57 trillion, greater than META's current market capitalization. Greater returns would require even more aggressive assumptions. For example, a 30x return would require OpenAI to become the world's most valuable company by a large margin. All I can say to the investors, with the best of hopes, is: Good luck! You'…

Don't some of these investors, such as Microsoft get access to run the models on their own servers as well as other benefits?

I thought Satya said Microsoft had access to everything during the Altman debacle.

Re: OpenAI completes deal that values company at $157B

#83
post #28
post #4

Given the high risk, investors likely want a shot of earning at least a 10x return. $157 billion x 10 = $1.57 trillion, greater than META's current market capitalization. Greater returns would require even more aggressive assumptions. For example, a 30x return would require OpenAI to become the world's most valuable company by a large margin. All I can say to the investors, with the best of hopes, is: Good luck! You'…

I think later rounds generally have lower return expectations - if you assume the stock market will return ~10%/year, you probably only need it to 2X by IPO time (depending on how long that takes) for your overall fund's IRR to beat the stock market.

You would if it were the fund’s only investment. But it won’t be. And this is still not a mature company, as their expenses currently vastly outnumber revenue, so there’s always a chance of failure.

Your general sense that the later stage higher dollar figure raises look for a lower multiple than the earlier ones is correct, but they’d consider 2x a dud.

Re: OpenAI completes deal that values company at $157B

#84
post #4

Given the high risk, investors likely want a shot of earning at least a 10x return. $157 billion x 10 = $1.57 trillion, greater than META's current market capitalization. Greater returns would require even more aggressive assumptions. For example, a 30x return would require OpenAI to become the world's most valuable company by a large margin. All I can say to the investors, with the best of hopes, is: Good luck! You'…

Don't some of these investors, such as Microsoft get access to run the models on their own servers as well as other benefits? I thought Satya said Microsoft had access to everything during the Altman debacle.

My understanding is that Microsoft has already earned a large return, from incremental Azure revenues.

Re: OpenAI completes deal that values company at $157B

#86
post #40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The difference is Tesla had a moat with the electric car market, there were no affordable and practical EVs 10 years ago. OpenAI is surrounded by competition and Meta is constantly releasing Llama weights to break up any closed source monopolies.

Tesla is still overvalued today with a moat that is more a puddle than anything. Elon realized that cars weren't gonna carry the hype anymore, so now it's all robotaxi, which will almost certainly be more vaporware.

I think he’s even past robo taxi and onto AI and robots that build robots that build robotaxis. I wish I were joking.

Re: OpenAI completes deal that values company at $157B

#87
post #40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>You'll need it! If they can IPO, they will easily hit a $1.5T valuation. All Altman would have to do is follow what Elon did with Tesla. Lots of massive promises marinated in trending hype that tickles the hearts of dumb money. No need to deliver, just keep promising. He is already doing it.

The difference is Tesla had a moat with the electric car market, there were no affordable and practical EVs 10 years ago. OpenAI is surrounded by competition and Meta is constantly releasing Llama weights to break up any closed source monopolies.

What's dogecoins valuation? Cardanos? Bitcoins? There is a nigh-infinite amount of capital ready to get entranced by a sexy story.

Re: OpenAI completes deal that values company at $157B

#88
post #77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The problems with central planning that capitalism ostensibly solves don't exist because of a lack of intelligence, but due to the impedance mismatch between the planner and the people. Making the central planner an AGI would just make it worse, because there's no guarantee that just because it's (super)intelligent it can empathize with its wards and optimize for their needs and desires.

The problem isn't AGI becomes the oracle central planner. The problem is AGI becomes the central planner, the government and everybody else who currently has a job.

I think there won't be just one AGI, no central planner. LLM abilities leak, other models can catch up in a few months.

Re: OpenAI completes deal that values company at $157B

#90
post #40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>You'll need it! If they can IPO, they will easily hit a $1.5T valuation. All Altman would have to do is follow what Elon did with Tesla. Lots of massive promises marinated in trending hype that tickles the hearts of dumb money. No need to deliver, just keep promising. He is already doing it.

The difference is Tesla had a moat with the electric car market, there were no affordable and practical EVs 10 years ago. OpenAI is surrounded by competition and Meta is constantly releasing Llama weights to break up any closed source monopolies.

The Nissan Leaf was far more affordable than a Tesla 10 years ago and very practical for anyone living in a city.
Post reply on HN