Live data from Hacker News

OrbStack: The fast, light, and easy way to run Docker containers and Linux

orbstack.dev

81–90 of 161 posts

Re: OrbStack: The fast, light, and easy way to run Docker containers and Linux

#81
post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I assume it matches whatever Rosetta advertises?

It's because Rosetta doesn't seem to emulate /proc/cpuinfo, so the contents reflect that of the arm64 host.

Yeah, it makes for VERY confused builds when you select on cpu features available.

Re: OrbStack: The fast, light, and easy way to run Docker containers and Linux

#82

Does anyone know if you can run arm64 images on a x86 Linux machine? I'm currently doing it with Docker and QEMU but it is super slow.

Emulation will generally be pretty slow, much slower than native virtualisation (although Rosetta has tricks to make this quicker).

Ideally use multi-arch images or build your own.

Re: OrbStack: The fast, light, and easy way to run Docker containers and Linux

#83

OrbStack is by far some of the best software I've encountered on Mac, but unfortunately I have difficulty convincing my employer to pay for a commercial license, and with my sparse Docker usage, I'm confined to using it only for personal/hobby usage. What's amazing is it fixes an (almost) show stopper bug when using libuv (or software that uses it like CMake) with Rosetta 2 [1], with the bug present on all Docker/VMs…

$8 a month/user for the speed and productivity improvement seems, err, shortsighted.

Re: OrbStack: The fast, light, and easy way to run Docker containers and Linux

#84
post #72
post #67

Earlier quoted context omitted.

MacBook Air M2 16gb ram leasing: 30€ per month orbstack pro business license: 10€ per month I don't think the hardware cost is prohibitive here. It's the death of a thousand paper cuts of a startup. I agree that orbstack would be a good investment, though.

My (somewhat sarcastic) comment was just that Apple hardware is more expensive than Linux/Windows hardware. If you use Linux then I would say the docker experience is quite good. I wonder if Linux hardware was an option; seems odd to require running stuff under docker but also force people to use macbooks...

Some places don't allow it due to MDM not being available/beta/untested for linux, althogh that has changed quite a bit over the past couple of years.

Re: OrbStack: The fast, light, and easy way to run Docker containers and Linux

#86
post #78
post #75

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have a machine with Colima and don’t want to bork it if I try Orbstack. I think I used “brew install docker docker-compose colima” and then “colima start”. Is “brew install orbstack” a drop in replacement for colima or does it install other things that might conflict?

Drop-in: "orb" to start, stop it + uninstall + restart Colima to revert. It can optionally install OrbStack's bundled `docker` and `docker compose` binaries, but you can also keep using the Homebrew ones.

use docker contexts, much easier :)

# Switch to OrbStack

docker context use orbstack

# Switch to Colima

docker context use colima

Re: OrbStack: The fast, light, and easy way to run Docker containers and Linux

#87

I switched to Orbstack about 2 weeks ago after having read about it here on HN. I develop a cloud native system entirely writen in Rust. All my own containers are build without Docker thanks to rules oci in Bazel. However, for integration testing, I'm using internal tools that fire up, say a database container and run the tests all from within Bazel to leverage test caching and parallelization. For a while, i was str…

> My CI server uses Firecracker VM's to isolate OCI containers Is this something you built yourself? I've been looking for a CI tool that uses Firecracker but never found anything, I started building something myself but it never really got finished. Would love to drop that project and use something off the shelf.

I'm obviously biased here but this is what we do at blacksmith dot sh. We run you GitHub Actions on consumer grade desktop CPUs with high single core performance, all inside ephemeral Firecracker VMs. Give us a shot!

Re: OrbStack: The fast, light, and easy way to run Docker containers and Linux

#88
post #18

I love how there is absolutely no mention that it is mac-only (or even what versions of mac are supported), even on the download page.

Yes. I'd like to have something that runs Docker images on desktop but doesn't require a privileged daemon, users, groups, etc.

Probably not what you're looking for but I just wanted to mention Apptainer (previously Singularity). I find that it is usually easier to integrate and doesn't rely on a daemon. You can still use docker images as base.

Re: OrbStack: The fast, light, and easy way to run Docker containers and Linux

#89
post #67
post #58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Spent all the budget on Apple hardware

MacBook Air M2 16gb ram leasing: 30€ per month orbstack pro business license: 10€ per month I don't think the hardware cost is prohibitive here. It's the death of a thousand paper cuts of a startup. I agree that orbstack would be a good investment, though.

> MacBook Air M2 16gb ram leasing: 30€ per month

How/where does one do this?

Re: OrbStack: The fast, light, and easy way to run Docker containers and Linux

#90

Err, you guys know that about 80% of desktops are Windows right? There's a bit of a myth that developers are all using macOS but in practice that's not really the case.

Maybe they like developing for Mac and that’s their niche, at least to begin with? You have to start somewhere.
Post reply on HN