Live data from Hacker News

Face.com acquired by Facebook

face.com

81–86 of 86 posts

Re: Face.com acquired by Facebook

#81
post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I recently discovered that Facebook had decided to remove my 'must approve when I am tagged' - nothing incriminating, just reminders of their abuse.

This is simply incorrect. Go to privacy settings, timeline and tagging, and change "review posts friends tag you in before they appear on your timeline"

I don't think that is what he is saying. He is saying he did this already and Facebook reverted his selection.

Re: Face.com acquired by Facebook

#82
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah. Can't wait for my facebook using mates to make my shadow profile more accurate.

This could revolutionize the Facebook signup process. Instead of entering all that pesky personal information, just snap a pic with your webcam. They already know all that info!

You joke, but the early signup process for Google App Engine was just your Gmail password, then they told you if you were accepted into the beta programme or not. They already read all your mail, they know if they wanted you in or not...

Re: Face.com acquired by Facebook

#83
post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I recently discovered that Facebook had decided to remove my 'must approve when I am tagged' - nothing incriminating, just reminders of their abuse.

This is simply incorrect. Go to privacy settings, timeline and tagging, and change "review posts friends tag you in before they appear on your timeline"

What part is incorrect? The OP claims the setting was set before and now it isn't set anymore. Telling him/her how to put it back doesn't address that....

Re: Face.com acquired by Facebook

#84
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is incorrect. Read the entire post and realize that Facebook has been using Face.com's tech for facial tagging already.

Though honestly, the domain is valuable too. Lots of people probably type in "face" expecting it to autocomplete, and it doesn't always.

Sure, but anyone who does that is already a Facebook user.

Re: Face.com acquired by Facebook

#85
post #46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The problem is this: What if I don't have an account, but somebody still happens to tag my face with my name, for whatever reason? I know that this is mostly about facebook users, but seeing how much facebook spam I get trying to incite me to join in, I could totally see them go this route - Encourage people to tag friends who aren't on facebook and thus give those friends no other choice but to claim their identity.

This already happens. When someone goes to your neighbors and asks around about you, your neighbors probably spill everything they know about you immediately. (If not immediately, a little story about an "ongoing investigation" should push them over the edge.) It's going to work the same way on the Internet. It's a little scary, but I prefer to think about the good applications rather than the bad applications. Havin…

Having realtime facial recognition at conferences, for example, would make my life a lot easier.

This is an advantage? This is what you're willing to give up your privacy for?

Re: Face.com acquired by Facebook

#86
post #74
post #71

Shameless plug here: http://search.labs.face.com - a site we developed for face.com lets you scan for faces all your Facebook photos and do some interesting searches on them, like "smiling child, female with glasses" etc.

So I'm guessing the whole face.com acquisition was to increase awareness of context of photos?

yup, this is my guess. it's all about understanding users more deeply. hypertargeted ads. what's in a photo these days? location + time. along with captions and photo titles, FB can infer what you were doing, where you were doing it, and when. but many photos go untagged because it's a pain to tag everyone. face.com solves this problem, connecting a person to all the valuable ad data in each photo.
Post reply on HN