Live data from Hacker News

Waymo to begin testing on San Francisco freeways this week

techcrunch.com

81–90 of 123 posts

Re: Waymo to begin testing on San Francisco freeways this week

#81

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah I think you have to change the traffic laws for that to happen. AFAIK, they strictly follow the speed limit, which feels too slow when everyone else is speeding.

IMHO we should start enforcing speed limits.

As they say, if you have to tell people to slow down, you designed your road wrong.

Re: Waymo to begin testing on San Francisco freeways this week

#82
post #80
post #77

I'm happy for Waymo and hope they continue to expand. I do expect Tesla to still win out on "robotaxis" in the nearish term, e.g. I expect them to have given way way more rides than Waymo by say 2030

Tesla has yet to demonstrate autonomous driving capability. A human ready to intervene in long tail scenarios (which is the hard part of the problem) does not constitute autonomous capability, no matter what the marketing material says.

> Tesla has yet to demonstrate autonomous driving capability

I'm betting on Waymo, too, but Tesla has chutzpah in a way Google and GM do not. That might permit them to take more risks (and incur more costs on the public) earlier.

In the end, avoiding a monopoly is always good.

Re: Waymo to begin testing on San Francisco freeways this week

#83
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Have you seen FSD 12.5.1.3?

He obviously hasn't. The tech community is in for quite a shock with Tesla robotaxi's come out in a year or so and blow out the competition. One factor not discussed often is how much smoother FSD is compared to all other self driving. Especially noticeable when going from FSD to the free AutoSteer or GM Supercruise.

> tech community is in for quite a shock with Tesla robotaxi's come out in a year or so and blow out the competition

12.5.1.3 is incredible. But it's still Level 3, attempting to do something stupid at least on every trip I've been in one.

I think Tesla will figure out Level 4 in the near future. What makes the "year or so" unrealistic is it will have to convince regulators that it's safe. For a variety of reasons, partly legitimate and partly due to Musk's antics, that might be difficult in a lot of the most lucrative markets (and markets where Teslas are).

Top comment's estimate for 2030 parity with Waymo et al is more realistic.

Re: Waymo to begin testing on San Francisco freeways this week

#84
post #71

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Comma has given up on self-driving cars and they're downplaying it now.

Comma is phenomenal at highway driving. Better than Tesla. They should keep on doing what they're doing. Make ~$1000 gadget that makes driving less of a chore. Doubtful they'll get to driverless in next 10 years. There can be many players in the market at different offerings and price points. Comma is a sweet spot where they are handsomely profitable, don't need to raise another round and get incrementally better. Wa…

Better than Tesla is not a high bar. Openpilot regularly slams on the brakes.

Re: Waymo to begin testing on San Francisco freeways this week

#85
post #75

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why do they use Jaguars? Seems an unnecessary expense.

They won't soon, the I-Pace is stopping production

I did spot a Waymo Zeekr on the street in San Francisco the other day. But all the other Waymos I've seen lately are still Jaguars.

Re: Waymo to begin testing on San Francisco freeways this week

#86

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Waymo has been doing public rides (2015) since before either company was founded (2016). Pony.ai also got their permit suspended twice in California for different safety-related reasons, so the comparison says more about the different regulatory environment in China than it does about their relative maturity.

Waymo was not doing public rides in 2015. It was invite only and you had to sign an NDA

They were doing rides for members of the public. That's a public ride.

Re: Waymo to begin testing on San Francisco freeways this week

#87

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Show me the statistics. If there is data which shows that autonomous vehicles are significantly safer than than the 90th percentile driver, then I absolutely will put my children in it. In fact, it might be irresponsible for me not to. School buses are an interesting case because they drive fixed routes, so you can imagine some intense mapping and route planning process which makes them even safer than a normal auton…

[dead]

Correction: Ram is at the top, while Dodge is fairly low down. Ram is exclusively trucks (formerly Dodge Ram) and was spun off in 2010, and is now owned by Stellantis.

No muscle cars, just oversized pickup trucks with a high rate of DUI (second to BMW).

Re: Waymo to begin testing on San Francisco freeways this week

#89
post #42

I don't understand why people are so eager to give up autonomy. I doubt the software is certified in any meaningful way (see DO-178B), the algorithms are unknown, and the NHTSA sits on its hands whenever these vehicles have accidents. Here is a litmus test: would you allow Waymo to drive schoolbuses with your children? I know I certainly will never allow my family or myself to get into a metal box going 80 mph withou…

> Here is a litmus test: would you allow Waymo to drive schoolbuses with your children? Waymo's obey all traffic laws and never drive tired, drunk, or distracted.

I had a Lyft driver who nodded off several times during a ride to the point we had him leave us at the nearest corner as soon as it was safe. It was genuinely scary.

I messaged Lyft and they really didn't seem to take it seriously or care. They of course worded it in a way to avoid any potential legal problems, and I doubt anything came of it. That driver should not be on the road.

There have been several other less notable incidents where I was worried for my safety.

I'm here for the robotaxis

Re: Waymo to begin testing on San Francisco freeways this week

#90
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I thought this as well, but I think it emerged in an Waymo interview that any weird thing that can happen on city street can also happen on a freeway and the reaction time is lower and the consequences higher on a freeway.

Freeways have some of the same challenges as streets, but not all of them. Treating the environment as if anything can happen at any time is just an "abundance of caution" thing. To use a real example, you don't get people walking up and throwing an egg at the side of your vehicle on controlled access freeways.

Rocks, not eggs, and top of vehicle, not side:

https://cphpost.dk/2016-08-26/news/more-rocks-being-thrown-f...

Post reply on HN