Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sure, and those are not “the same kind of people” with the same motives nor rationale nor basis in knowledge as the people advocating for constraints around social media in the present day. There are religious bookbanners today and they have very little overlap with the anti-social media crowd.
> There are religious bookbanners today and they have very little overlap with the anti-social media crowd. I guess we're going to have to agree to disagree on that. To me it doesn't matter whether there's any actual overlap between the groups. It's the censorious impulse they share. Believing that they have the right to make this type of decision for others is what makes them the "same kind of people".
A censorious impulse is a censorious impulse, after all!
Obviously you can use whatever taxonomy of people you want, but yours seems like an extremely esoteric and rather useless one.