81–83 of 83 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I find "MAGA ghoul" offensive.
Honest question: why? MAGA's brand is being unapologetically offensive. Surely they can take what they give.
- assert without evidence
- rationalize
This does not refute my point in the slightest: calling someone a 'ghoul' is pejorative, even if one finds their platform unattractive.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Honest question: why? MAGA's brand is being unapologetically offensive. Surely they can take what they give.
You: - assert without evidence - rationalize This does not refute my point in the slightest: calling someone a 'ghoul' is pejorative, even if one finds their platform unattractive.
It was two separate things.
First I wanted to know what you found offensive, and you answered.
My second comment was more of a broad statement that a movement like MAGA that is itself intentionally pejorative and bigoted towards so many others in society (evidence of this is widely available) can certainly take some name-calling without crying foul.
It had nothing to do with your sensibilities or your right to be offended by said name calling. But I wasn't clear about it I guess.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
You: - assert without evidence - rationalize This does not refute my point in the slightest: calling someone a 'ghoul' is pejorative, even if one finds their platform unattractive.
I wasn't actually trying to refute anything, sorry if it came across that way. It was two separate things. First I wanted to know what you found offensive, and you answered. My second comment was more of a broad statement that a movement like MAGA that is itself intentionally pejorative and bigoted towards so many others in society (evidence of this is widely available) can certainly take some name-calling without cr…
As is the source of any "bigotry" on offer in this thread.
One hopes that you have an excellent weekend.