Live data from Hacker News

The Meaning of Bitcoin

maraoz.com

81–84 of 84 posts

Re: The Meaning of Bitcoin

#81
post #17

Argentina may have serious monetary problems, but does the USD? Do we really need financial innovation to move at the "pace of programmers?" Is "bitcoin" really money when you can't use it to buy anything without converting it to money first?

Not only is it nearly impossible to use anywhere... but a huge component of BTC's mythology is making fun of someone who ACTUALLY spent it as money (Bitcoin Pizza)

It is celebrated, not made fun of.

Re: The Meaning of Bitcoin

#82

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No. If you're happy with USD, then use USD. If you are Argentinian (or Venezuelan, or Iraqi, or Zimbabwean) and your currency is getting devalued to nothing and the government is restricting access to your funds and preventing you from holding USD, then Bitcoin or Stablecoins are a pretty good option. The attitude I see a lot (mostly by Americans and Western Europeans) is that "Crypto is not useful to me, therefor it…

> and the government is restricting access to your funds and preventing you from holding USD, then Bitcoin or Stablecoins are a pretty good option. If your government is going as far to prevent you to own USD, they aren't going to view cryptocurrencies any more favorably anyways.

The article talks about one such example, Argentina, and how it was harder to own USD than Bitcoin there.

Re: The Meaning of Bitcoin

#83

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Exactly, but the value proposition of crypto is that it's *very* difficult to disrupt. See Nigeria for a current example of a national government trying and failing to get its population to give up on crypto.

It's even easier to disrupt than dollars, at least exchanging dollars as cash is popular whereas cryptocurrencies rely predominantly on exchanges and bank transfers.

If you can exchange cash you can just exchange crypto at the same time as well.

Instead of dollar bills for peso bills you exchange a crypto transaction for peso bills.

Re: The Meaning of Bitcoin

#84

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There is a multitude of governments involved in Bitcoin with different incentives and strategies. If you claim "The government can do X to Bitcoin" you should explain which government(s) and how exactly that would work. When was the FED a "democratically elected government", by the way?

Any nation's legislature, if threatened with loss of control of the nation's money, would immediately make it illegal to use any tender not sanctioned by that state. A vast amount of the state's historical policing was aimed largely at preventing alternative currencies from forming (consider, e.g., Isaac Newton's role at the Royal Mint). They will put you in jail; withdraw your business licence and suspend your limit…

One merely needs to look at US history to see that this is incorrect, before the Federal Reserve existed there were several competing bank "currencies" backed by gold that were commonly used instead of gold because they were easier to exchange, but with the knowledge that they could be traded for gold if needed.
Post reply on HN