Live data from Hacker News

PSA: How to keep using adblockers on Chrome and Chromium

gist.github.com

81–90 of 101 posts

Re: PSA: How to keep using adblockers on Chrome and Chromium

#81
How many people are gonna do all this to get an adblocker working? How long is this workaround gonna be allowed by google?

What excuses remain for sustaining the chromium monopoly that allows this shitshow, and for using chrome and chromium derived browsers instead of firefox?

Re: PSA: How to keep using adblockers on Chrome and Chromium

#82
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's IE all over again. Sometimes you can't.

IE was technically garbage and people eagerly wanted to get away from it as it broke sites. Sites are now mostly built and tested on Chrome. Firefox breaks sites.

Removing ad blocking is what breaks the internet for me. Firefox is working 99.9% fine except 0.1% of site which I usually do not miss or in the worst case open in another browser. This is an insignificant nuance compared to the constant distraction of not using an ad blocker.

Re: PSA: How to keep using adblockers on Chrome and Chromium

#85

Question: Is it possible to run ad blocking at the OS level rather than in the browser? Requests to ad servers just never leave your PC? traffic from ad servers just never arrives at the browser?

On Android there is AdGuard which runs a VPN locally to block ads. It can also parse SSL traffic if one installs an SSL certificate but I don't like the idea very much. In the end I just use it as a light adblock for unencrypted traffic when I don't use Firefox.

Re: PSA: How to keep using adblockers on Chrome and Chromium

#86
post #76
post #70

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Every app there are gets worse and worse -- aka Doctorow's enshittification So people will just take the sudden deluge of ads in stride and move on. Chances of this moving people to Firefox is slim.

Almost every adblock user will move to firefox. They didn’t install it out of boredom, cause that’s non-trivial. I mean it is trivial, but the world fights over defaults now and there are people who only use defaults and complain when they change. So yeah, they will move. Download an app, import userdata, reinstall extensions and blog about this hacker-news-level journey.

> reinstall extensions

I've done this journey. This step is exceptionally difficult, sometimes impossible. https://github.com/exile-center/better-trading

And it's even more difficult because I can't find a link to the original store page from an addon within firefox so I can't easily share my findings. https://i.imgur.com/zh2M9YA.png I do not see a link. Perhaps fixing that should have been a priority for Mozilla instead of a bullshit alt generator but it's AI so of course it's got priority. Instead of doing everything in their power to grow their market share ... spreadfirefox reboot when.

Re: PSA: How to keep using adblockers on Chrome and Chromium

#87
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There will be a switch available ... but only for a period of time before the functionality is completely removed

And apparently, as per this post, only available to folks who are savvy with the command-line.

No, use a chromium derived browser, like https://github.com/win32ss/supermium.

Or use firefox, it will always support adblockers.

Re: PSA: How to keep using adblockers on Chrome and Chromium

#88
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And apparently, as per this post, only available to folks who are savvy with the command-line.

No, use a chromium derived browser, like https://github.com/win32ss/supermium . Or use firefox, it will always support adblockers.

No kidding, thanks but I do use Firefox. As for Chrome, the writing is on the wall.

It's not so shiny any longer.

Re: PSA: How to keep using adblockers on Chrome and Chromium

#89

Earlier quoted context omitted.

After the XUL removal debacle a number of years ago, I can't trust Firefox to offer a suitably flexible and capable extension system over the long run. While some people will claim that those changes were necessary, the impact was still very negative for the extension developers and users who were affected at the time. The numerous other user-hostile decisions made by Firefox's developers certainly don't help repair…

If this is about trust, Google is by far less trustworthy. Firefox is a flawed option vs. a shitty non-starter option.

why do you think that? mozilla is not without its controversies and google basically owns them
Post reply on HN