Live data from Hacker News

Congress Just Made It Basically Impossible to Track Taylor Swift's Private Jet

gizmodo.com

81–90 of 129 posts

Re: Congress Just Made It Basically Impossible to Track Taylor Swift's Private Jet

#81

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Its frustrating because it buries better points under mud. The effective way to reduce jet emissions is not to publicly rag on the people who have the money to use the service. I would go so far as to say that the author does not actually care about the subject at all, only perhaps being able to deride others to prop themselves up as not as bad as them. The subject as presented like this leaves little room for talk a…

More than that, it ignores the fundamental principle that America is founded on: I paid for it STFU. If there is actual market failure due to externalities then get the votes to raise the cost to cover the externalities (i.e though a carbon tax), but don't think your judgement calls on who should be able to do what should have any bearing on reality. Raise the price until your externality is properly priced or until…

Better start would be petrol not aviation fuel

Re: Congress Just Made It Basically Impossible to Track Taylor Swift's Private Jet

#82
post #8

> Of course, it’s worth pointing out that, unlike someone like Musk, Swift actually had a pretty good reason to travel a lot last year: she was on tour. Yes, because the richest man on the planet, heading up multiple billion dollar companies, couldn’t possibly have any legit reason to travel anywhere.

That line approaches peak first world detachment; the things that actually matter are superfluous entertainment.

[deleted]

Re: Congress Just Made It Basically Impossible to Track Taylor Swift's Private Jet

#83
post #76

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We have irrefutable evidence that Elon was the top executive at companies that did all those things, while you have no evidence that those things would have happened without him.

No need to prove it wouldn't have happened without him. They already design new rockets, robots and chip without him being on site because he's busy with Twitter. And I guess it's pretty easy for him to do a remote session if he needs to. He has his own Internet company. Otherwise it's like driving a combustion car if you own a electric car company. Doesn't mean he designed a rocket, robot or chip.

[deleted]

Re: Congress Just Made It Basically Impossible to Track Taylor Swift's Private Jet

#84
post #16
post #8

> Of course, it’s worth pointing out that, unlike someone like Musk, Swift actually had a pretty good reason to travel a lot last year: she was on tour. Yes, because the richest man on the planet, heading up multiple billion dollar companies, couldn’t possibly have any legit reason to travel anywhere.

It doesn't say he couldn't have any legit reason but less than an artist you gets paid to perform in front of an audience. I bet for many travels of Musk this would be true: "This Meeting Could Have Been an Email"

Conversely, I bet that Musk has so many demands on his time that he doesn't go to any meeting that isn't 100% essential.

Re: Congress Just Made It Basically Impossible to Track Taylor Swift's Private Jet

#85
post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do you think Elon is giving meaningful input on the design of robots, rockets or brainchips?

Yes, I do. People working with him in SpaceX have said so. And in the other cases, his leadership, financial, business, product and marketing input is still a necessary part of the project that directly influences the technical decisions.

He has a degree in physics and one in economics, both from Penn.

Re: Congress Just Made It Basically Impossible to Track Taylor Swift's Private Jet

#86
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It doesn't say he couldn't have any legit reason but less than an artist you gets paid to perform in front of an audience. I bet for many travels of Musk this would be true: "This Meeting Could Have Been an Email"

Conversely, I bet that Musk has so many demands on his time that he doesn't go to any meeting that isn't 100% essential.

Given his time spent trolling on Twitter, I doubt that is true.

Re: Congress Just Made It Basically Impossible to Track Taylor Swift's Private Jet

#87

I enjoy the tone of this article, which thinks we are entitled to track the movement of private citizens if it involves too much jet fuel.

Why not? The rich, the police and government track our every movement, word and deed through our technology. Why shouldn't we be able to track them back? If we can't dismantle the pantopticon let's at least make it equitable. Everyone suffers.

Re: Congress Just Made It Basically Impossible to Track Taylor Swift's Private Jet

#88

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I really want to see you design rockets, robots and brainchips using email. Taylor Swift could have livestreamed on YouTube.

Good news: Musk has done none of those things. At best he's distracted and interfered with people who did those things.

You think companies as successful as SpaceX, Tesla or Neuralink would have been possible without Musk?

Re: Congress Just Made It Basically Impossible to Track Taylor Swift's Private Jet

#89
post #75

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I really want to see you design rockets, robots and brainchips using email. Taylor Swift could have livestreamed on YouTube.

You really think Musk himself designed the rockets, robots and brain chips? For clarification email is a metaphor for anything that could be done remotely, like designing rockets, robots and brain chips. The Swift fans on the other hand pay to see her live, that's the USP of a concert.

> You really think Musk himself designed the rockets, robots and brain chips?

You really think any of that would have been possible without him? What EV company is as successful as Tesla? How many rockets does the second most successful company launch every year?

Re: Congress Just Made It Basically Impossible to Track Taylor Swift's Private Jet

#90

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Conversely, I bet that Musk has so many demands on his time that he doesn't go to any meeting that isn't 100% essential.

Given his time spent trolling on Twitter, I doubt that is true.

"Recreation" and "work" are two different things.
Post reply on HN