Live data from Hacker News

What happens to Google Maps when tectonic plates move? (2020)

nautil.us

81–84 of 84 posts

Re: What happens to Google Maps when tectonic plates move? (2020)

#81

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Back in the day GPS was intentionally offset so countries couldn't use it for weapons.. well except it's owner of course!

It seems like the intentional degradation didn't work as intended in the first place and the inaccuracy could be corrected with little effort - at least for someone who had the resources to use it for weapons systems, so it only affected civilian use cases. > Because SA affects every GPS receiver in a given area almost equally, a fixed station with an accurately known position can measure the SA error values and tran…

Yes, differential GPS was used to correct the error. It wasn't useful for military purposes though: it took a LOT of time to set up a base station and allow it to collect readings and measure the SA error values. It wasn't a quick thing. And, you had to know exactly where the base station was in the first place.

If you're a civilian doing surveying work, it was fine: you stick the base station at a known location, let it work for a few hours, and then you had high-precision GPS in that area. If you're a military power attacking someone on their own ground, it's not so useful. Even worse if you're at sea.

Re: What happens to Google Maps when tectonic plates move? (2020)

#82

Earlier quoted context omitted.

50 ft seems a little large for plate tectonics , plates move on the order of a centimeter per year [1]. (similar to fingernail growth!) [1] https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/tectonics.html

I believe North America/ Australia is off by around 10 feet since GPS became a thing.

The 2011 Tohoku earthquake moved Japan's main island (Honshu) by 2.4m (8ft) in 6 minutes.

Re: What happens to Google Maps when tectonic plates move? (2020)

#84

I often think about a scifi story where after X million years, somehow familiar humanity survives, and two plates containing land with VERY different natural flora and fauna approach each other - for example, california, home of many native plant defenders, and australia. As they get closer than 50 miles, news would start to mention making sure not to cross-transplant animals and plants. Under 20 miles, the wind and…

It's difficult to imagine human beings behaving in such a cautious way, when Australian trees have already been so widely transplanted across California that I grew up believing eucalyptus were native.
Post reply on HN