81–85 of 85 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is it. Having a monopoly is OK. Being anticompetitive is when you run into trouble, even potentially without a monopoly.
Likely part of the move to merge their drivers into the linux kernel etc.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> George Hotz' new company is working to undo this Is that before or after George Hotz solves homelessness and drug addiction and saves democracy ( https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39206959 )
Geohotz is baby Musk. He'll eventually find an area where he can put his brain to ideal use and change the world a bit. He's obviously sharp, but hasn't found the niche that works for him. Musk is obviously a transportation guy. Maybe Hotz will end up in Infra?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Geohotz is baby Musk. He'll eventually find an area where he can put his brain to ideal use and change the world a bit. He's obviously sharp, but hasn't found the niche that works for him. Musk is obviously a transportation guy. Maybe Hotz will end up in Infra?
Reading about his 8-ish hour stint at post-Musk-acquisition Twitter was really funny.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Likely part of the move to merge their drivers into the linux kernel etc.
Putting drivers in the Linux kernel isn't anticompetitive. Saying they're the only drivers allowed in the Linux kernel would be anticompetitive.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
We need more anti monopoly action, not less.
We need more anti-anticompetitive action. Why should NVidia and those who use their products be punished because their competitors have not stepped up to the plate?
Company profits are not the top priority, if it stuffers so that actually important values are preserved, there's no problem with that at all.