New GeForce RTX 4080 Super, RTX 4070 Ti Super, RTX 4070 Super
81–90 of 135 posts
Re: New GeForce RTX 4080 Super, RTX 4070 Ti Super, RTX 4070 Super
#82Re: New GeForce RTX 4080 Super, RTX 4070 Ti Super, RTX 4070 Super
#83> All three GeForce RTX 40 SUPER Series GPUs are faster than their predecessors It's weird that they're only comparing the new cards to the RTX 30's and 20's, and not the "v1" 40's. I assume the 4080 SUPER is faster than the 4080 (based on name?) but it seems cheaper and there's absolutely no comparison data
This was what I came to comment. Very strange. This article https://beebom.com/nvidia-rtx-4080-4070-ti-super-gpu-specs-r... says "the RTX 4070 Ti Super is up to 10% faster than the non-Super 4070 Ti on average" So, on average, up to 10% faster, yeah seems pretty incremental.
Ive a lot of AMd Nvidia machines - two high-end gaming machines.. the naming conventions of Nvidia cards are just odd to me and I can tell what anything actually means..
Re: New GeForce RTX 4080 Super, RTX 4070 Ti Super, RTX 4070 Super
#84Re: New GeForce RTX 4080 Super, RTX 4070 Ti Super, RTX 4070 Super
#85Earlier quoted context omitted.
With the current generation of text and image generators, 24GB is the sweet spot
I wouldn't be shocked if the 5090 is also the only one with 24GB. Seems like NVidia is trying their hardest to suppress memory increases.
Re: New GeForce RTX 4080 Super, RTX 4070 Ti Super, RTX 4070 Super
#86Earlier quoted context omitted.
Considering the poor generational performance uplift the original 4000 series cards had vs the 3000 series - it almost seems like these super variants are what nVidia should have originally launched. :-/
Poor performance uplift? The 4080 is significantly faster than the 3090 with much lower power consumption!
here's a review from a traditionally pro intel and nvidia outlet: https://www.techpowerup.com/review/nvidia-geforce-rtx-4080-f...
Re: New GeForce RTX 4080 Super, RTX 4070 Ti Super, RTX 4070 Super
#87Earlier quoted context omitted.
With CPUs I'd say skip more than 1. I've been doing every 4 generations, and given how poorly Intel's 14th gen performed, I'm waiting another still. The improvements are very small in this space right now, for the most part.
Yeah I'm doing totally fine with an i7-9700K, although having 32gb sure helps. 2060Super GPU is starting to feel dated though!
Re: New GeForce RTX 4080 Super, RTX 4070 Ti Super, RTX 4070 Super
#88That being said, these look competent enough, just stingy with VRAM still making them less desirable for longer use (4+ years) in either playing games or training models.
Re: New GeForce RTX 4080 Super, RTX 4070 Ti Super, RTX 4070 Super
#89Earlier quoted context omitted.
This was what I came to comment. Very strange. This article https://beebom.com/nvidia-rtx-4080-4070-ti-super-gpu-specs-r... says "the RTX 4070 Ti Super is up to 10% faster than the non-Super 4070 Ti on average" So, on average, up to 10% faster, yeah seems pretty incremental.
The big difference with the 4070 Ti Super is that it's using the AD103 chip (with a full 256-bit memory bus and 16GB of VRAM) found in the 4080, which is a huge leap over the AD104 chip found in the 4070 Ti (non-Super), which only touts a 192-bit memory bus and 12GB of VRAM. While the TFLOPS of the Super variant does only see a ~10% increase as you note, memory bandwidth jumps by 42% and the memory capacity jumps by…
Ergo, there's a decent chance it won't sell for MSRP.
Re: New GeForce RTX 4080 Super, RTX 4070 Ti Super, RTX 4070 Super
#90All I want is a low-power passively-cooled replacement for my aging 5GB Quadro P2000 that doesn't crash out while running the new Lightroom denoise algorithms. None of these seem likely choices in that area, sigh.