Earlier quoted context omitted.
What problem does a magical "does what I mean" undo solve that pressing ^W or ^H doesn't? At a minimum, your "superior workflow" is " ui" or "^Ou", both of which are more keystrokes and require your editor to read your mind.
Or my superior workflow is Alt-u or hold U, which is a single shortcut/keystroke, so you lose there as well The other issue with your attempt at solving undo without undo is that the deletion doesn't become part of redo, also a single word with a typo could be in the middle of a paragraph where you navigated with a trackpad, while ^W would delete near the current cursor position You don't need magic to fix the ubersi…
Text Editor Data Structures: Rethinking Undo
81–84 of 84 posts
^W is ctrl-W.
Re: Text Editor Data Structures: Rethinking Undo
#82Earlier quoted context omitted.
Or my superior workflow is Alt-u or hold U, which is a single shortcut/keystroke, so you lose there as well The other issue with your attempt at solving undo without undo is that the deletion doesn't become part of redo, also a single word with a typo could be in the middle of a paragraph where you navigated with a trackpad, while ^W would delete near the current cursor position You don't need magic to fix the ubersi…
^W is ctrl-W.
So what? How does it address the issue I've described?
Re: Text Editor Data Structures: Rethinking Undo
#83Re: Text Editor Data Structures: Rethinking Undo
#84Earlier quoted context omitted.
So what? How does it address the issue I've described?
It's the same number of keypresses as alt-U.
So now it's not "more keystrokes" as you originally claimed (and it's a higher number of keypressses vs holding U), and you still haven't addressed the issue with ^W I've described