81–90 of 339 posts
I would love to use their API but I can never get anyone to respond to me. It's like they have no real interest in being a developer platform. Has anyone gotten their vague application approved?
For coding it is still 10x worse than gpt4. I asked it to write a simple database sync function and it gives me tons of pseudocode like `//sync object with best practices`. When I ask it to give me real code it forgets tons of key aspects.
Except: you can feed it an entire programming language manual, all the docs for all the modules you want to use, and _then_ it's stunningly good, whipping chatgpt4 that same 10x.
I would love to use their API but I can never get anyone to respond to me. It's like they have no real interest in being a developer platform. Has anyone gotten their vague application approved?
I guess that design is at least honest: OpenAI field the system prompt in a separate fragment of JSON, but it all gets concatenated back together (with some magic delimiter tokens) when it's fed to the underlying model.
For coding it is still 10x worse than gpt4. I asked it to write a simple database sync function and it gives me tons of pseudocode like `//sync object with best practices`. When I ask it to give me real code it forgets tons of key aspects.
Except: you can feed it an entire programming language manual, all the docs for all the modules you want to use, and _then_ it's stunningly good, whipping chatgpt4 that same 10x.
Although we're not using Claude in production (yet), it's a regular part of our testing when we build new features with LLMs. Part of the reason why we haven't used it (yet) is because OpenAI had more certifications faster, so we went to market with them. And their API has just gotten better and more reliable ever since, and it's cheap. But now that Claude is in AWS Bedrock that opens up some things for us that were…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's awful. 9/10 of things I ask Claud, I get denied because it crosses some kind of imaginary ethical boundary that's completely irrelevant.
Interesting! I use the APIs for various NLP tasks and I have never had it deny generating answers.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
For the sake of pedantry, I believe that Racket thinks it's separate to Scheme now, history and similarity notwithstanding.
I usually say Racket Scheme because probably nobody has heard of Racket - really a niche language. You can choose between numerous language types, and Scheme is one of them. You are correct, Racket is kind of a language creation tool now.