Live data from Hacker News

Giant batteries drain economics of gas power plants

reuters.com

81–90 of 153 posts

Re: Giant batteries drain economics of gas power plants

#81
post #62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Why call this political uncertainty as opposed to economic uncertainty? I'm assuming this is because so much of the energy market is directed through political mechanisms like subsidies, research funding etc. It's the political uncertainty that undergirds the economic uncertainty.

Not to mention taxes, mandates, sanctions , and even wars

I've often wondered if anyone has ever studied what the "all in" cost of gasoline would be taking account of all those externalities.

Re: Giant batteries drain economics of gas power plants

#82

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why call this political uncertainty as opposed to economic uncertainty? The future is intrinsically uncertain. The only thing that has changed is new entrants to the market. If gas plants can be replaced by something cheaper then they will be. If gas plants make economic sense, they will be built. The fact that gas developers have to model additional players in their markets to prove their economic viability seems fi…

> "If gas plants can be replaced by something cheaper then they will be" This is a simplification of what is a highly complex, interdependent, path dependent and regulated system, with long lead times, and more priorities than just least-cost. The energy system's development isn't the unfolding of an endogenous economic rationality - it's very messy! For all those reasons, it's usually best understood through the len…

[deleted]

Re: Giant batteries drain economics of gas power plants

#83
post #66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Now do it with volume. Plus, aren't you forgetting that electric vehicles need an motor too? Also, I think you mean 80k lbs, not 80 tons? And it's the range + time that's a killer. Recharging time would likely be a deal breaker even if you could get the same cargo capacity. FWIW, I agree that electric trucking is the future, just disagree how close we are to that as a reality. My main gripe is how the problem tends t…

You're right. It's a 5% hit, not a 2% hit. Trucks spend a lot of time loading, unloading and on mandatory driver rest breaks. Charging can and will be done during those times. The biggest expense in a trucking operation is diesel. Trucking has cut-throat margins. Once electrification starts in the industry, everyone will switch quickly, or go bankrupt. Some routes will be hard to electrify, but the cost savings on th…

You are right about the costs and margins. However, a large portion of the cost disparity is because diesel fuel costs incorporate a lot of taxes to fund road maintenance. The electric costs do not, and I suspect that will have to change. Road maintenance funds will have to come from somewhere, and most states are reluctant to take from other tax areas.

Re: Giant batteries drain economics of gas power plants

#84

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's quite likely that in the future electricity sellers will need to pay a tariff to cover the operation of flywheels.

Not sure why the cost would be borne by sellers. More likely consumers will pay for it as part of the grid infrastructure in my opinion.

Well, currently the sellers are the ones directly paying for the grid infrastructure.

It makes much more sense. They are the ones that can choose what part of the grid they plug on, and they are the ones choosing if they provide the service or not.

Re: Giant batteries drain economics of gas power plants

#85
post #62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Why call this political uncertainty as opposed to economic uncertainty? I'm assuming this is because so much of the energy market is directed through political mechanisms like subsidies, research funding etc. It's the political uncertainty that undergirds the economic uncertainty.

Sure, but why is that special for gas plants? CTs are expensive to run so if they run less that is generally good for people using electricity. I am not saying political uncertainty doesn’t exist or that the grid systems are apolitical or that building plants is easy. I don’t know much about the UK grid or rules which is why I was asking for specifics on what makes this specific case political.

Just speculation, but I imagine there is much less volatility in terms of fossil fuel policies. Fossil fuels (regretfully) have large and entrenched lobbyists who seem to get continued political support regardless of the office party. Contrast that to policies for/against renewables which have become a signaling mechanism.

Re: Giant batteries drain economics of gas power plants

#86

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> that means generation will become unprofitable For that time period. At the same time, using energy becomes supremely profitable. This isn’t a weird quirk of the power markets; compute time is also instantaneous. It’s just less noticeable because we haven’t unified a market for it. These are amply solvable problems.

> For that time period. For the time period that the most common generators generate the most energy. By itself, that guarantees that there won't be enough investment to create excess renewables. Or at least that markets won't make that investment. If you want excess renewables (and they are a safety and security necessity), you need to fund it by something that isn't interested on direct ROI.

> If you want excess renewables

Sure, agreed. I don’t think this is something we should necessarily want. But if it is, it would require subsidy.

Re: Giant batteries drain economics of gas power plants

#87

The reality is much more complex than "batteries replace gas" - > Developers can no longer use financial modelling that assumes gas power plants are used constantly throughout their 20-year-plus lifetime, analysts said. > Instead, modellers need to predict how much gas generation is needed during times of peak demand and to compensate for the intermittency of renewable sources that are hard to anticipate. > "It does…

A major problem here is that intermittency isn't consistent. Okay, solar doesn't generate at night, so you would need to charge some batteries during the day and discharge them at night. Maybe that's fine. But solar also generates less in winter. If we want to transition heating from oil and gas to electric, we need a lot of generation in the winter. If we build some more solar to do that, now there's way more than e…

But the capacity needed to top up that battery on a cloudy week is still less than having a gas plant having to meet peak demand.

Kinda like the BMW i3 with Rex. You charge it at home (solar), but when it gets low the on-board generator (gasoline 2 cylinder) can trickle charge your battery until you get home (where you have solar again).

Re: Giant batteries drain economics of gas power plants

#88
post #83

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You're right. It's a 5% hit, not a 2% hit. Trucks spend a lot of time loading, unloading and on mandatory driver rest breaks. Charging can and will be done during those times. The biggest expense in a trucking operation is diesel. Trucking has cut-throat margins. Once electrification starts in the industry, everyone will switch quickly, or go bankrupt. Some routes will be hard to electrify, but the cost savings on th…

You are right about the costs and margins. However, a large portion of the cost disparity is because diesel fuel costs incorporate a lot of taxes to fund road maintenance. The electric costs do not, and I suspect that will have to change. Road maintenance funds will have to come from somewhere, and most states are reluctant to take from other tax areas.

24 cents per gallon of diesel aren't a significant portion of fuel costs nor do they come anywhere close to paying for the roads.

Re: Giant batteries drain economics of gas power plants

#89

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The nice thing is as long as these markets stay reasonably competitive, economics can figure out what to do with excess renewables. When renewables are in excess, the spot (instantaneous) energy price will drop to near zero (or sometimes negative in weird situations). That is good for existing (short term) batteries (they can recharge cheaply), but it will also provide price signals to people considering investing in…

> the spot (instantaneous) energy price will drop to near zero Yes, and that means generation will become unprofitable. We seem to be a decade or so away from the point where the investment on generation can't be decided by direct ROI. And nobody is preparing for this. Governments need a long time to regulate that kind of thing... so we can expect some problems on the near future.

I think Renewables (especially solar) tend to be fairly easy to cutail (stop generating) and can probably avoid generating much during negative prices. I'd guess the negative prices will probably mostly hit legacy assets that don't have that ability.

Re: Giant batteries drain economics of gas power plants

#90
post #85

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sure, but why is that special for gas plants? CTs are expensive to run so if they run less that is generally good for people using electricity. I am not saying political uncertainty doesn’t exist or that the grid systems are apolitical or that building plants is easy. I don’t know much about the UK grid or rules which is why I was asking for specifics on what makes this specific case political.

Just speculation, but I imagine there is much less volatility in terms of fossil fuel policies. Fossil fuels (regretfully) have large and entrenched lobbyists who seem to get continued political support regardless of the office party. Contrast that to policies for/against renewables which have become a signaling mechanism.

What? Gas prices in Europe are extremely volatile [0]. Neither lobbyists nor politicians control prices and even if they did it isn’t obvious the lobbyists would prefer smooth prices.

[0] https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/eu-natural-gas

Post reply on HN