Live data from Hacker News

Opal Tadpole – A webcam for laptops

opalcamera.com

81–90 of 120 posts

Re: Opal Tadpole – A webcam for laptops

#81

These guys have spammed me three times today via SMS, even after unsubscribing from all their notifications. I'm sorry but I cannot take them seriously. Who in hell thought this is normal or acceptable?

Pretty sure SMS is pretty expensive fines per message in the US especially if there’s no unsubscribe feature, let alone one that doesn’t work.

Re: Opal Tadpole – A webcam for laptops

#82
Am I missing something or is "smallest webcam" a provably false statement? My laptop has an integrated camera that fits in the bezel, I own several Raspberry Pi cameras that are much smaller than this, and the word "tad" is doing a lot in the phrase "just a tad taller than a gummy bear".

Don't get me wrong, I don't particularly care seeing as the camera is suitably small and the other webcams are not fit for the same purpose, but my point is that if all I have to go on is the marketing, it doesn't inspire confidence.

Edit: The average height of a gummy bear is 2cm and the Tadpole is 3.5cm tall. A gummy bear is nearly half as tall (57%) as a this camera. I really dislike this copy.

Re: Opal Tadpole – A webcam for laptops

#83
post #5

What is the market for this product? I can't see their being enough people who a. have a laptop without a camera/need a better camera b. are willing to lug this thing around and c. are willing to pay $200. How is web design this bad acceptable? It's insanely slow, annoying to read and impossible to navigate.

Def value a good camera and mic with laptop.

Especially for extended work sessions or presentations.

Appearing clearer and sounding clearer can go a long way to being better received.

Re: Opal Tadpole – A webcam for laptops

#84
post #78
post #71

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Came to say basically the same thing. Not to mention they also refer to their F1.8 "Glass" when their own technical specs list the lens elements as plastic. It's basically a $10 sensor, a $5 mic, $5 of miscellaneous plastic and circuitry, and yet they want $175 for what? I might have given all their typical startup BS and hyperbole a pass if it was like $79 or something reasonable, but at $175 it just seems like a sc…

I’d love to learn how to build one of my own from you since it’s that easy? The form factor here is ideal. Also unclear if it’s 4K (can help with brightness in less than ideal lighting. My understanding is the same components still have to be driven well to work together by custom software for high quality?

It's 1080p. From the specs

> Resolution 48MP binned to 1080P

Re: Opal Tadpole – A webcam for laptops

#85

I have been using my iPhone as a webcam for the last 2 years. The quality is just phenomenal. EpocCam Pro.

It's now a feature built into macOS/iOS, to use iPhone as a webcam for a computer

Yeah. I did see that. The phone has to be locked. I kept unlocking and losing the feature. I was confused first haha. But it is pretty darn good.

Re: Opal Tadpole – A webcam for laptops

#88
post #84
post #78

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I’d love to learn how to build one of my own from you since it’s that easy? The form factor here is ideal. Also unclear if it’s 4K (can help with brightness in less than ideal lighting. My understanding is the same components still have to be driven well to work together by custom software for high quality?

It's 1080p. From the specs > Resolution 48MP binned to 1080P

That's ridiculous. 48MP should be capable of at least 4K video. Are their yields still not high enough at 4K even if they're charging an order of magnitude more than what the components actually cost?

Re: Opal Tadpole – A webcam for laptops

#89
post #61

This is not a "mirrorless camera sensor", at least how it's meant to be interpreted. While technically mirrorless like all webcams, the sensor is under a quarter of the area of the smallest Sony mirrorless intechangeable-lens cameras.

By their definition my phone camera also qualifies as mirrorless.

it's like yeah there's no mirror that flips up to expose the sensor because there's no optical through-the-lens viewfinder either...which is what the mirror was for in the first place...

Seems like a cool idea though, but it seems like it could be done even better: get an iPhone 15 Pro Max sensor and put it behind an actual quality glass lens, then add in the beam-forming mic array stuff and MAKE IT A NORMAL CLASS-COMPLIANT WEBCAM, which unlike the C1, the Tadpole is from what I understand.

Re: Opal Tadpole – A webcam for laptops

#90
post #84

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's 1080p. From the specs > Resolution 48MP binned to 1080P

That's ridiculous. 48MP should be capable of at least 4K video. Are their yields still not high enough at 4K even if they're charging an order of magnitude more than what the components actually cost?

They don’t have any yields. This is an off the shelf Sony sensor and they chose the cheaper binned part.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exmor

Post reply on HN