Live data from Hacker News

An Old Conjecture Falls, Making Spheres a Lot More Complicated

quantamagazine.org

81–83 of 83 posts

Re: An Old Conjecture Falls, Making Spheres a Lot More Complicated

#81

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Just like Feynman said: Physics is like watching internet porn. Sure, it may have useful results, like ad revenue, but that's not why we do it

>Feynman said: Physics is like watching internet porn. The Internet existed when Feynman died in 1988, but Internet porn did not, at least not watchable (video) Internet porn.

Surely, you must be joking

Re: An Old Conjecture Falls, Making Spheres a Lot More Complicated

#82
post #71
post #67

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You are right, but I am pretty sure they just meant the inner tube ignoring the puncture for inflation. Usually people just use donut/bagel for an illustration of a torus. Not sure why they used inner tube here - maybe to make it clear it is just the surface?

A hollow inner tube with the puncture for inflation is topologically equivalent to a solid torus, if I understood correctly.

My understanding is they're non-homeomorphic. You can thread a string in through the inflation hole (valve hole) on an inner tube, around the great circle inside the tube, and then out the valve hole. You can also, of course go through the centre as with a donut/bagel/torus. But you can't do the former threading with a donut, so the torus and whatever the inner-tube are not typologically equivalent.

Another way to consider it is if you have a circle around the valve hole, you can't stretch that circle to be one of the two possible circles you could draw on a torus (around the 'trunk' and around centred on the donut-hole).

Anyway, I think they just chose a bad example, this was just where my mind went.

Re: An Old Conjecture Falls, Making Spheres a Lot More Complicated

#83
post #75

The following slides contain a more concrete description of the conjecture, its motivation and consequences: https://people.math.rochester.edu/faculty/doug/Talks/Glasgow...

I hate slide decks like these, where every page in the PDF contains one more bullet point than the last one. Maybe I'm particularly bad at this, but I spend way too long scanning each page for the new information. Is it impossible to configure LaTeX to only produce the final animation step as a completed page and skip the intermediate ones?

The ideal way to read a deck like this, is to download the pdf and enter present mode on your pdf viewer so that you can click through each slide and immediately see where the new material has been added.
Post reply on HN