Live data from Hacker News

Most promoted and blocked domains among Kagi Search users

kagi.com

81–90 of 502 posts

Re: Most promoted and blocked domains among Kagi Search users

#81
post #60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Umm, according to the latest data, user choice is far less competitive than algorithms at stabilizing engagement metrics. Users' behavior speaks louder than what they believe in their little heads.

Can't tell if sarcasm or not.

[deleted]

Re: Most promoted and blocked domains among Kagi Search users

#82
Pinterest was certainly the first site I blocked.

I've never understood the hate for w3schools. No, it's not MDN, but it's not offensively bad either, and it's been a helpful reference from time to time. If w3schools comes up first in a search, I trust that it probably has the answer to whatever very simple question I must have asked, unlike something like Pinterest, which will just be spam no matter what.

Re: Most promoted and blocked domains among Kagi Search users

#83

I actually did a smaller thing for HN. I have client side JS that blocks results from a few domains that seemed to promote low quality discussions and/or irrelevant submissions. const boringDomains = [ "newyorker.com", "nytimes.com", "economist.com", "wired.co.uk", "bbc.com", "aella.substack.com", "hecolumn.substack.com", "wsj.com", "kqed", "voanews.com", "wusa9.com", "noemamag.com", "arstechnica.com", "independent.c…

...BBC? Ars Technica? ...KQED and VOA? You're blocking discussion of some of the most reliably factual reporting on the planet.

shrugs I don't really feel the need to defend the contents of that list. If the resulting conversations suck, aren't relevant to me, and clog up the HN front page - in they go.

Re: Most promoted and blocked domains among Kagi Search users

#84

I actually did a smaller thing for HN. I have client side JS that blocks results from a few domains that seemed to promote low quality discussions and/or irrelevant submissions. const boringDomains = [ "newyorker.com", "nytimes.com", "economist.com", "wired.co.uk", "bbc.com", "aella.substack.com", "hecolumn.substack.com", "wsj.com", "kqed", "voanews.com", "wusa9.com", "noemamag.com", "arstechnica.com", "independent.c…

...BBC? Ars Technica? ...KQED and VOA? You're blocking discussion of some of the most reliably factual reporting on the planet.

The parent poster said

>... that seemed to promote low quality discussions

My guess is that these domains are responsible for hot button topics that result in 300+ comment threads.

Re: Most promoted and blocked domains among Kagi Search users

#85
post #49
post #31

Google: we need to have your personal information because that allows us to provide you with a better experience. Me: Ok, please block these domains: "pinterest.com, w3schools.com, ..." Google: Sorry, can't do that!

Pinterest is absolutely the worst; most of the time the linked page doesn't even have what I was looking for.

It has blown my mind for years the extent to which the Google Image Search team let Pinterest completely undermine the usefulness of their product, and they just kept on giving pinterest the top search result spots.

It's honestly more useless than the pages with a list of 1000 phone numbers that you get when you try to search for who an unknown number is.

Does anyone even work on Google Image Search? Is it run by a bunch of undercover Pinterest employees who infiltrated the team and pushed out the Googlers?

Re: Most promoted and blocked domains among Kagi Search users

#86

Surprised to not see fandom.com on there. Just copy/paste plus SEO of actual wikis plus so many ads you can't read the content.

Unfortunately, fandom has a decent amount of original content in addition to the copy/paste stuff, so you'd miss out on quite a bit if you block them.

Re: Most promoted and blocked domains among Kagi Search users

#87

I actually did a smaller thing for HN. I have client side JS that blocks results from a few domains that seemed to promote low quality discussions and/or irrelevant submissions. const boringDomains = [ "newyorker.com", "nytimes.com", "economist.com", "wired.co.uk", "bbc.com", "aella.substack.com", "hecolumn.substack.com", "wsj.com", "kqed", "voanews.com", "wusa9.com", "noemamag.com", "arstechnica.com", "independent.c…

...BBC? Ars Technica? ...KQED and VOA? You're blocking discussion of some of the most reliably factual reporting on the planet.

The point was they tended to have low quality discussion. Probably because it turned into partisan mud slinging.

Re: Most promoted and blocked domains among Kagi Search users

#88

I've never quite understood the w3schools hate. It can be quite useful. My most used page is this one when I need to jog my memory: https://www.w3schools.com/cssref/css_selectors.php It's much better than this one: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/CSS_selecto... Or any of the other results on the first page

It used to be worse. But overall I agree with you. Its accurate albeit often a bit simplistic.

Re: Most promoted and blocked domains among Kagi Search users

#89
post #31

Google: we need to have your personal information because that allows us to provide you with a better experience. Me: Ok, please block these domains: "pinterest.com, w3schools.com, ..." Google: Sorry, can't do that!

I’ve never been able to put into words my problem with the contrast between massive data aggregation and the degraded user experience of the web.

This completely frames it for me.

I was very hesitant to pay for a search engine at first, but Kagi has turned into the “stickiest” monthly subscription I have.

Re: Most promoted and blocked domains among Kagi Search users

#90
post #12

I've never quite understood the w3schools hate. It can be quite useful. My most used page is this one when I need to jog my memory: https://www.w3schools.com/cssref/css_selectors.php It's much better than this one: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/CSS_selecto... Or any of the other results on the first page

It often outranks MDN official docs which these days are very readable, in-depth, with examples, and a simple UI and the only time I click to inappropriately named W3Schools is by accident because it's the top result and I'm expecting MDN and then I click back and that's why I don't like it.

Nothing about that makes w3 a poor source. I get why you block it - so MDN is shown first. That’s fair. Im just saying its not a fault of W3. Because I tend to agree with that guy. W3 really isnt bad. A bit simplistic, and MDN is better, but its not bad.
Post reply on HN