Live data from Hacker News

The Death of Infosec Twitter

cyentia.com

81–89 of 89 posts

Re: The Death of Infosec Twitter

#81
post #65

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Translation: I only care about what my political enemy is doing will turn a blind eye everything else

Elon bought twitter with the help of the Saudis, so go ahead and tell me how helping out the family that funded 9/11 is somehow fighting al-qaeda

musk_and_kushner_at_world_cup_finals.jpeg

Re: The Death of Infosec Twitter

#82
post #65

Earlier quoted context omitted.

translation: al-qaeda had a twitter account before the mediocre-man with a middle-life crisis accidentally bought it. Now the nazis have accounts there.

Translation: I only care about what my political enemy is doing will turn a blind eye everything else

> will turn a blind eye everything else

incorrect

this is a throwaway and will remain so, but before the troubles people were already complaining about twitter being infested with nazis, it's just that then whatever had been done to get rid of them was undone, thus my comment

Re: The Death of Infosec Twitter

#83

This same exact thing happened to the blind community, of which I'm a member of. Blind Twitter was pretty vibrant before Elon took over, but that changed almost completely around November/December of last year. The killer change for us was the death of third-party clients, on which blind people relied almost exclusively. The whole community is on Mastodon now, mostly concentrated around two instances, though there ar…

Glad to hear a new home was found. My child and I began to analyze random public braille the other day out of random interest and found it was surprisingly easy to pick up a few letters, apparently being both alphabetic and potentially conceived as some kind of semi-derived state from regular roman shapes which provides a handy memory reference for we sighted people. I'd be very interested to hear what the best brail…

Braille screens are prohibitively expensive. Most blind people on the internet either have enough sight to navigate a heavily vision-optimized interface (high-contrast, large text) or use a screen reader, or both.

As far as input goes, braille keyboards are more affordable, but many users can touch-type (and have their screen reader read back). Dictation is also a mature option at this point.

Blind people need 3rd-party apps because these apps can be more compatible with screen readers, or can be themed in an easier way allowing for blind-friendly presets. In general, official apps tend to be heavily obfuscated to prevent automated scraping and puppeting. Since blind users often need to basically puppet their devices by not using common interfaces, this puts them at odds with corporations who do not care about them and would ban them if allowed. The alternative is of course not to use big tech products but just because you have a disability shouldn't mean you are abandoning at least half the current web.

Re: The Death of Infosec Twitter

#84

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What I dislike about Mastodon is how people talk about "moving to Mastodon". Unlike Twitter, FB etc. you don't just "move to Mastodon"... you move to some ActivityPub server. Which one? They don't want you to know I guess? Edit: thanks for the pointers!

But they're specifically moving to Mastodon (infosec.exchange and defcon.social), which is not the same as moving to Lemmy, KBin, or PixelFed. For example, Lemmy federates with KBin, but not with Mastodon. Kbin federates both with Lemmy and Mastodon. Also, Mastodon has a Twitter-like UX, while Lemmy/Kbin have a Reddit-like UX. PixelFed has a Flickr-like UX. It makes a difference, and insisting on calling them Activit…

You are making the same mistake. There is no Mastodon as a place or protocol. There's ActivityPub and a bunch of server/client software. Mastodon is one of those

Re: The Death of Infosec Twitter

#85

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What I dislike about Mastodon is how people talk about "moving to Mastodon". Unlike Twitter, FB etc. you don't just "move to Mastodon"... you move to some ActivityPub server. Which one? They don't want you to know I guess? Edit: thanks for the pointers!

But they're specifically moving to Mastodon (infosec.exchange and defcon.social), which is not the same as moving to Lemmy, KBin, or PixelFed. For example, Lemmy federates with KBin, but not with Mastodon. Kbin federates both with Lemmy and Mastodon. Also, Mastodon has a Twitter-like UX, while Lemmy/Kbin have a Reddit-like UX. PixelFed has a Flickr-like UX. It makes a difference, and insisting on calling them Activit…

Lemmy federates with Mastodon. You can @ a community to post in it.

Re: The Death of Infosec Twitter

#86
post #71

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think the reason is more practical. Mastodon is distributed, user-controlled, and easily managed. You can just choose to simply not interact with privacy-adverse systems rather than being forced to use a single centralized system.

> I think the reason is more practical. Mastodon is distributed, user-controlled, and easily managed. I don't think that's the reason because most of the infosec people I follow moved to a single instance (infosec.exchange)

But it is. Users chose infosec.exchange because it promised what there were after, but if the instance admins start misbehaving, it would be significantly easier to migrate again to another, or their own, Mastodon instance. The difficulty of search in federated spaces means users are more likely to centralize themselves, but the movement federation offers ensures no funny business on an admins part.

Re: The Death of Infosec Twitter

#87

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Glad to hear a new home was found. My child and I began to analyze random public braille the other day out of random interest and found it was surprisingly easy to pick up a few letters, apparently being both alphabetic and potentially conceived as some kind of semi-derived state from regular roman shapes which provides a handy memory reference for we sighted people. I'd be very interested to hear what the best brail…

Braille screens are prohibitively expensive. Most blind people on the internet either have enough sight to navigate a heavily vision-optimized interface (high-contrast, large text) or use a screen reader, or both. As far as input goes, braille keyboards are more affordable, but many users can touch-type (and have their screen reader read back). Dictation is also a mature option at this point. Blind people need 3rd-pa…

Understood. What do you feel the tipping point would be on price and features for an open source braille display? In particular, what is the required number of rows / columns for English to make it very useful?

Re: The Death of Infosec Twitter

#88
I for one welcome the decentralized internet that Elon is ushering in. Things were better when we had small disparate forums where people could develop their perspectives in community. As long as people are members of multiple communities we should have enough cross-pollination and course corrections to keep things mostly on track.

Mods and groupthink are always a threat but it turned out they were a bigger threat still when everyone was trying to be on one social network to rule them all.

Re: The Death of Infosec Twitter

#89

This same exact thing happened to the blind community, of which I'm a member of. Blind Twitter was pretty vibrant before Elon took over, but that changed almost completely around November/December of last year. The killer change for us was the death of third-party clients, on which blind people relied almost exclusively. The whole community is on Mastodon now, mostly concentrated around two instances, though there ar…

Is anyone suing them for ADA violations, or does the site work 'well enough' with accessiblity tools to avoid it?
Post reply on HN