What kind of hardware do you use to install OPNsense? Please don't suggest to buy some old Dell optiplex from ebay. Hardware that can beat any commercial vendor, is better.
OPNsense: Open-source security platform
81–90 of 151 posts
Re: OPNsense: Open-source security platform
#82I'm currently upgrading my box to add an NVMe M2 SSD, so I'm moving the VM to a spare box, doing the upgrade, then moving it back. The VM itself knows nothing, no reinstall and reconfigure, minimal downtime. Easy af.
Was using pfSense for a few years until a couple of years ago, upgraded to OPNSense. The plan is to keep OPNSense for much longer than a handful hardware cycles.
Re: OPNsense: Open-source security platform
#83Recently transitioned from Ubiquit stuff to a OPNSense setup. It was such a good decision. The firewall rules make much more sense. Better functions than the dream machine series. You can also get a lot more for the same price. Ubiquti hardware is very under spec for the money you pay for. Highly recommend this guide to setup your own. It’s very dense and more verbose than you need so skip the irrelevant sections. [1…
I switched to pfSense from EdgeRouter a few years back, and find the firewall rules make _less_ sense. The reason is likely that I understand IPTables pretty well, where as the approach used in pfSense seems "abstract" in comparison. I'd certainly recommend grabbing something like a Protectli box (if power draw is a concern) or building a small server with NICs to install OPNSense on over the Ubiquiti stuff. For me,…
I learned a lot in the last 3 weeks it also helped me understand networking a lot more. Sure I had to do a lot of trial and error or figure out why things don't work but in the end it was worth it for me.
I came from 30€ OpenWRT routers with only 100mbit links which is why I upgraded.
The hAP ax³ were 140€ a piece (I use two) and the one 2.5Gb PoE port is actually nice since it powers the second router. It was a pricey upgrade compared to what was there before. I tried to buy another OpenWRT router but RouterOS seems to offer 10 times more compared to what OpenWRT can do.
I've looked at a lot of things even one of the more looked at super cheap thin client for this stuff (Fujitsu Futro S920).
At home I can't really justify a dedicated firewall.
Re: OPNsense: Open-source security platform
#84Where's the OPsense NixOS mashup at? Or is it not necessary with a sufficient NixOS config?
Re: OPNsense: Open-source security platform
#85Earlier quoted context omitted.
I switched to pfSense from EdgeRouter a few years back, and find the firewall rules make _less_ sense. The reason is likely that I understand IPTables pretty well, where as the approach used in pfSense seems "abstract" in comparison. I'd certainly recommend grabbing something like a Protectli box (if power draw is a concern) or building a small server with NICs to install OPNSense on over the Ubiquiti stuff. For me,…
I recently switched to RouterOS. The learning curve was a bit high to me. I'm still tinkering with it but I got my main things working - vlans, default internet access out via vpn, one port (internet accessible server) routed without vpn. I learned a lot in the last 3 weeks it also helped me understand networking a lot more. Sure I had to do a lot of trial and error or figure out why things don't work but in the end…
Re: OPNsense: Open-source security platform
#86Earlier quoted context omitted.
The Ubiquiti controller is fine if you're managing one site, but beyond that it's pretty poorly designed IMO. By far the biggest problem is that they don't give enough consideration to recover-ability of offsite devices. If something causes a device to disconnect from the controller their solution is to SSH in and re-adopt it. That doesn't work once you're dealing with hundreds of devices across dozens of sites. A go…
Those are all very valid points you raise. I’ve also faced the recoverability problem when something goes awry. I’ve also noticed their ISP line has difficulty being reachable via API when they lose internet connectivity, even if you are local to the network. That said, is there anything better? Mikrotik, while more configurable, is so much worse and feels straight out of the 90s design-wise. Beyond those options I’m…
Re: OPNsense: Open-source security platform
#87Recently transitioned from Ubiquit stuff to a OPNSense setup. It was such a good decision. The firewall rules make much more sense. Better functions than the dream machine series. You can also get a lot more for the same price. Ubiquti hardware is very under spec for the money you pay for. Highly recommend this guide to setup your own. It’s very dense and more verbose than you need so skip the irrelevant sections. [1…
How does the link aggregation work? I get that OPNSense can do this, but do you need a switch with a capability to make sense of this? I'm considering moving from Unifi USG to OPNSense and have two Cat6a runs from one end of the house to the other (through the loft and it's not possible to add more runs without building/decorating work). Presently the two cables do WAN and LAN, but I've been curious about putting som…
Re: OPNsense: Open-source security platform
#88OPNsense is the core router platform I default to for all my network infrastructure (work devops env, homelab, vpn to family members etc). Its feature packed and ROCK solid. I almost always run it in a virtual machine so i can live migrate it between hosts and have no downtime. The cluster / high availability works great and ensures no loss of connectivity during upgrades. OPNsense is a true hidden gem in the open so…
I used to find it rock solid, but around two years ago reliability tanked. I found myself regularly having issues with interfaces (a genuine Intel server-grade multi-port NIC) flip-flopping. About a year ago, I started having random issues with traffic no longer routing, out of the blue. Lately both issues seem to have gone away. Right now the software update function dies half the time I try to run a check, with a l…
My initial read here would be that this is where serial port / console redirection is happening. There should be settings in the BiOS you can look at however I don't know how limited PC's are in their options / functionality.
>I find the project pretty outdated and behind the times. The UI purposefully obtuse with terrible organization and field names and a lot of missing help text to keep their support/consulting biz strong.
pfSense was the same way as well as most projects if you understand the underlying configurations. You can find people saying the same about ubiquiti's interface in this thread as well. In my experience the GUI is to capture the 80% of mostly default configurations.
What other firewall/routing software have you looked at in comparison to opnsense? I'm interested in what other features they have? The API interface and IDS functionality was one of the draws for me.
>Their release process is wildly unsuitable for production network equipment. A 'major' release is immediately EOL'd as soon as the next major release comes out. Running 20.1 and need to stay on it because 20.2 breaks something or you want to wait for the dust to settle? Too bad. There's no security releases for older major revisions.
I mean are you saying this as a paying customer? Free always has its risks and costs.
> The devs are sticks in the mud, too - mostly "franco." > wireguard being "insecure" > ARM support? Zero interest in even assisting community efforts
I observe this with projects overtime and this usually just adds to the bloat and disorganization because everyone is looking for "their" one-stop solution. I think its useful to consider things from other view points and complexities you may not have insight into. Not that I have any specific insight into this project however, there are other companies that make a lot money off networking gear, firewalls, etc and provide what you are asking for but the price isn't free. I assume most open source projects are "best-effort" unless they have a formal revenue stream or foundation behind them and even then I wouldn't expect any claim to expect features or support (not saying you are, just generally).
Re: OPNsense: Open-source security platform
#89Recently transitioned from Ubiquit stuff to a OPNSense setup. It was such a good decision. The firewall rules make much more sense. Better functions than the dream machine series. You can also get a lot more for the same price. Ubiquti hardware is very under spec for the money you pay for. Highly recommend this guide to setup your own. It’s very dense and more verbose than you need so skip the irrelevant sections. [1…
How does the link aggregation work? I get that OPNSense can do this, but do you need a switch with a capability to make sense of this? I'm considering moving from Unifi USG to OPNSense and have two Cat6a runs from one end of the house to the other (through the loft and it's not possible to add more runs without building/decorating work). Presently the two cables do WAN and LAN, but I've been curious about putting som…
packet loss at summer temps is indicative of faulty hardware (maybe just the thermal paste or other parts of the heat management)
Re: OPNsense: Open-source security platform
#90Pfense is practically no longer open source. OPNsense has come a long way and even has some features pfsense does not