Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's a fallacy to believe that all projects are just sold to the lowest bidder. There are probably a dozen reasons why something like this might have occurred, and not giving the vendors a free pass, but assuming that a more expensive vendor would do a better job with security and reviews is just as likely to be a mistaken belief. If a project is too expensive for a client to do well, they should not be doing that wo…
The way that government procurement often works, it isn't the cheap contractors you end up with, either. Not many companies have the resources or willingness to stick through the long time it often takes to go through the bidding process, nor all of the pre-qualification requirements. The whole process is long and drawn out with all sorts of checks and balances built in to it, based on previous learnings from previou…
We tried to book a train ticket and ended up with a 245k records data breach
81–83 of 83 posts
Re: We tried to book a train ticket and ended up with a 245k records data breach
#82Earlier quoted context omitted.
They don't just accept the lowest bid. It's the lowest bid that complies with the requirements . You can tighten up the requirements and conditions.
You can also consider the demonstrated qualifications/competency of the bidder. I could submit a low bid for a project and if I have no history of ever completing similar projects my bid can be rejected on that basis. However (at least in the few governemnt bids I've been involved in) if the low bidder does not get the award, they can challenge the award and often do. Then the government has to defend their decision…
Good luck with that. It is prejudiced discrimination because you assume that if the bidder never did a contract like what you're looking for, they will not be able to do it.
It would be just like you don't want to hire a junior because they never worked before :)
Re: We tried to book a train ticket and ended up with a 245k records data breach
#83Earlier quoted context omitted.
If that were true, then there would be zero disasters in high liability countries. liability doesn’t prevent disasters from happening. For example: UK Grenfall towers. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-61724373 It is a wrong to assume that only engineers can cause deadly mistakes. Also we have penal liabilities that don’t need licensing: The [UK] Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 is designed to stop employers putting the…
If you're looking for a perfect solution to pretty much any problem involving humans, I have bad news for you.
You are talking Nirvana fallacy https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nirvana_fallacy