Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Tree of Thoughts

github.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

81–85 of 85 posts

Re: Tree of Thoughts

#81

Post by pupperino »

pixl97 wrote: post #67
pupperino wrote: post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> And an unchained LLM trained on reality is far more capable of finding solutions to that problem than a bunch of squabbling politicians. Not that I disagree with this statement, I don't, but this is not a silver bullet. Technology is, ultimately, operated by humans and no amount of frontier research and development can overcome collective action problems. At some point, you do have to sit down with these stupid pol…

Technology is operated by humans now, but I believe it is a mistake to think that technology could not evolve to the complexity that it can operate itself.

Sure, but is this what we want, as engineers? Can computers be held accountable?

Re: Tree of Thoughts

#82

Post by renyujia »

joshka wrote: post #63
flakiness wrote: post #58

Note that the repo author != the paper author. The research itself [1] seems legit. The paper author also wrote a paper called ReAct [2], which is one of the core components of the langchain framework. * [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.10601 * [2] https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.03629

Interestingly a 2 days prior to https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.10601 , someone released https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.08291 > Large Language Model Guided Tree-of-Thought > In this paper, we introduce the Tree-of-Thought (ToT) framework, a novel approach aimed at improving the problem-solving capabilities of auto-regressive large language models (LLMs). The ToT technique is inspired by the human mind's approach for solving c…

BTW the ToT implementation of https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.08291 is also available on GitHub:

https://github.com/jieyilong/tree-of-thought-puzzle-solver

"Large Language Model Guided Tree-of-Thought"

Re: Tree of Thoughts

#83

Post by BSEdlMMldESB »

ipsum2 wrote: post #77
neuronexmachina wrote: post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm a little confused about what the relation is (if any) between the OP link and the repo from that paper: https://github.com/ysymyth/tree-of-thought-llm Is it basically a reimplementation using Guidance instead of openai's API directly?

The user kyegomez writes shitty, incorrect implementations of popular papers to obtain clout.

super cynical viewpoint... maybe that's just how he understands things?

in any case, what a player tho... learning AND obtaining clout?

Re: Tree of Thoughts

#84

Post by ysymyth »

This is Shunyu, author of Tree oF Thoughts (arxiv.org/abs/2305.10601).

The official code to replicate paper results is https://github.com/ysymyth/tree-of-thought-llm

Not https://github.com/kyegomez/tree-of-thoughts which according to many who told me, is not right/good implementation of ToT, and damages the reputation of ToT

I explained the situation here: https://twitter.com/ShunyuYao12/status/1663946702754021383

I'd appreciate your help by unstaring his and staring mine, as currently Github and Google searches go to his repo by default, and it has been very misleading for many users.

Re: Tree of Thoughts

#85

Post by SillyKyoushi »

ysymyth wrote: post #84

This is Shunyu, author of Tree oF Thoughts (arxiv.org/abs/2305.10601). The official code to replicate paper results is https://github.com/ysymyth/tree-of-thought-llm Not https://github.com/kyegomez/tree-of-thoughts which according to many who told me, is not right/good implementation of ToT, and damages the reputation of ToT I explained the situation here: https://twitter.com/ShunyuYao12/status/1663946702754021383 I'…

I found this comment from searching "tree of thoughts arxiv github" on Google; so at least, there's that. Thank you for the official link! I'm eager to try out this deliberate problem solving stuff.
Post reply on HN