Sounds like Altman used his personal relationship with Microsoft CEO to do this meaningless PR stunt, so he can more easily pursaude stupid money to actually invest in this.
Helion’s fusion power purchase agreement with Microsoft
81–90 of 258 posts
Re: Helion’s fusion power purchase agreement with Microsoft
#82HN, what the heck has happened to you? What is with all of these cynical comments? Helion is an awesome company, their technology is real, and this is cool. >oh no this might not work! Do you guys not understand that you’re posting on the forum of a venture capital firm/startup accelerator?
Re: Helion’s fusion power purchase agreement with Microsoft
#83HN, what the heck has happened to you? What is with all of these cynical comments? Helion is an awesome company, their technology is real, and this is cool. >oh no this might not work! Do you guys not understand that you’re posting on the forum of a venture capital firm/startup accelerator?
Re: Helion’s fusion power purchase agreement with Microsoft
#84Earlier quoted context omitted.
What the hell is this cynicism? Seems completely inappropriate. Helion isn’t vaporware.
While you’re probably right about GP’s cynical tone, this announcement does seem fairly meaningless. Does Helion have a working prototype that can be reasonably moved into production? Or is that still years away?
Re: Helion’s fusion power purchase agreement with Microsoft
#85Earlier quoted context omitted.
Electricity is a commodity. How could they possibly have a working product that they can’t sell? Just hook it up to the grid and there you go.
Nuclear fission works right now but is frequently too expensive per megawatt-hour to build. There's no real reason fusion couldn't end up the same way.
It's the fate of most technologies to fail this way, so it shouldn't be surprising (or a source of dishonor) if the same thing happens to fusion. That doesn't mean money spent developing fusion is necessarily wasted; the size of the energy market -- a quadrillion dollars or so over the 21st century -- justifies longshot investments.
Re: Helion’s fusion power purchase agreement with Microsoft
#86Earlier quoted context omitted.
While you’re probably right about GP’s cynical tone, this announcement does seem fairly meaningless. Does Helion have a working prototype that can be reasonably moved into production? Or is that still years away?
Helion in 2014: We're about 3 years away from break-even energy. https://www.wsj.com/articles/BL-VCDB-15246
Re: Helion’s fusion power purchase agreement with Microsoft
#87Earlier quoted context omitted.
8 years ago, HN was a place full of optimism and excitement. I've noticed a marked increase in cynicism in this place. Like most of the world, it suffers from extreme tribalism and group think. I miss the former positive HN. And the positive world. sigh
The cynicism for me at least is a result of reality actually getting markedly worse (at least in the USA) over the last 10 years. However, none of that has anything to do with fusion tech, so I remain hopeful about that!
Re: Helion’s fusion power purchase agreement with Microsoft
#88Sounds like Altman used his personal relationship with Microsoft CEO to do this meaningless PR stunt, so he can more easily pursaude stupid money to actually invest in this.
What the hell is this cynicism? Seems completely inappropriate. Helion isn’t vaporware.
Re: Helion’s fusion power purchase agreement with Microsoft
#89One positive: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_bDXXWQxK38
One critical: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3vUPhsFoniw
Re: Helion’s fusion power purchase agreement with Microsoft
#90Sounds like Altman used his personal relationship with Microsoft CEO to do this meaningless PR stunt, so he can more easily pursaude stupid money to actually invest in this.
What the hell is this cynicism? Seems completely inappropriate. Helion isn’t vaporware.