Earlier quoted context omitted.
Incorrect. Here are some actual numbers: https://blog.wesleyac.com/posts/consider-sqlite > Writing 512 byte blobs as separate transactions, in WAL mode with synchronous=normal3, temp_store=memory, and mmap enabled, I got 13.78μs per write, or ~72,568 writes per second.
Go on, trust the metrics. It locked up every time I had to do many writes without delay.
Ask HN: Is PostgreSQL better than MySQL?
81–83 of 83 posts
Re: Ask HN: Is PostgreSQL better than MySQL?
#82Here's my experience with PostgreSQL: Coming from Oracle, I've been able to use PostgreSQL pretty much as though it were Oracle, including Oracle's optimistic locking strategy. Some of the SQL functions are a little different, but it seems the underlying philosophy is the same. In other words, PostgreSQL seems like Oracle, just a little different. MySQL has always felt completely foreign to me. Depending on your back…
Hah, I always felt the same about Postgres and I still prefer the MySQL cli. The concept of schema is also weird for MySQL users, although pervasive in some kind of Michael Stonebreaker' worldview.
Re: Ask HN: Is PostgreSQL better than MySQL?
#83Earlier quoted context omitted.
Hah, I always felt the same about Postgres and I still prefer the MySQL cli. The concept of schema is also weird for MySQL users, although pervasive in some kind of Michael Stonebreaker' worldview.
I can understand it being weird, but when you get used to it, it's really really handy, for instance to manage user rights. I've read somewhere that actually, pg schemas compares more with mysql database, postgresql databases being an additional level wrapping it.