81–90 of 1001 posts
Astounding amount of cynicism here, so I'll say something positive: Transparency is undoubtly important, I'm glad we can see how all of this works and what sort of effort goes into building a social media system. It's licensed under GPL which is a bummer (would have preferred BSD) but it's better than nothing.
> Today, the For You timeline consists of 50% In-Network Tweets and 50% Out-of-Network Tweets on average, though this may vary from user to user.
It would’ve been interesting to see what changes were made since Musk’s takeover. As someone who followed 5,000+ users, I know I never saw a tweet that wasn’t either from nor retweeted by someone I followed — e.g. I never saw those “[user you follow] liked [someone you don’t follow] tweet”
50%/50% in FYP seems to reflect my experience today — which is much worse, to the point that I’ll regularly switch to viewing by List b/c I miss seeing people who I want to read.
I wonder how much testing and analysis went into deciding on the 50/50 ratio — e.g. how does it impact user engagement and behavior. Because it sounds like an easy round value that you’d land on when thinking “users should be pushed out of their bubbles”
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The author_is_elon flag doesn't surprise me, but the two political designators are somewhat shocking. I'd sure like to know what changes based on what Twitter knows about your political affiliation.
The repo suggests it's about tracking engagement metrics[0], so Team Red people see more Team Red content and vice versa. Nothing nefarious. [0] https://github.com/twitter/the-algorithm/blob/7f90d0ca342b92...
Astounding amount of cynicism here, so I'll say something positive: Transparency is undoubtly important, I'm glad we can see how all of this works and what sort of effort goes into building a social media system. It's licensed under GPL which is a bummer (would have preferred BSD) but it's better than nothing.
Assuming anything in this codebase is worth reusing, I'm glad it's GPL. It's a case where I'd like open-first to spread.
That makes me think, this is actually a good call. Twitter can claim that they have complete transparency while not allowing anyone to touch their code (because it is GPL). "Anyone" being future competitors. If it was BSD licensed, it'd be tremendously useful in building a Twitter competitor (on paper, you still need network effects, I am just spitballing to make a point).
[1]: https://github.com/twitter/the-algorithm/blob/main/home-mixe...
Typically, we expect to be able to run "open source" software ourselves. If you open-source your C compiler, I can compile a C program with it. In a few recent high-profile cases though, companies have "open sourced" ML systems without releasing the model weights. This practice is just like your releasing the builds scripts for your C compiler, but not the compiler itself. While more transparency from social media wi…
"Today, the For You timeline consists of 50% In-Network Tweets and 50% Out-of-Network Tweets on average, though this may vary from user to user." I have spent significant effort creating a network and there you go choosing to ignore my efforts by putting in 50% of crap-I-don't-want-to-see. That is why I despise your algorithm.
This is just one feed (the "For You" recommendations feed), they also have the "following" feed tab next to it that is 100% your network (want you want), and it remembers your selection when you change between them (they fixed that a few months ago), so really this is kind of a pointless thing to despise for that reason. It's just an option you can 100% avoid if you don't want to see it.
In fact, Twitter is probably one of the only few left in the large social media space that actually gives you an 100% following network feed (minus maybe ads) in chronological order that REMEMBERS your selection (Facebook, Instagram, and TikTok don't). Which makes this even more silly to say. Facebook, Instagram, and TikTok do all have in-network exclusive chronological order feeds, BUT they are extremely hard to find, or don't remember your selection to them.
Hate of Twitter is easy to spoon out, but at least complain about things that aren't already solved for you.
I'm not opposed to social media feeds having complex recommendation algorithms. I just wish they allowed you to opt in to a reverse chronological feed of only people you follow, like RSS.
Twitter has this now. The home page is split into two tabs: "For you", the algorithmic feed, and "Following", the reverse chronological feed of just who you follow.
https://github.com/twitter/the-algorithm/blob/main/ci/ci.sh
Permalink: https://github.com/twitter/the-algorithm/blob/7f90d0ca342b92...