>
Not once did I mention 'haptic' in my post so why did you raise it in your reply?Because that was the whole subject of the article -- replacing buttons that move with haptic-feedback buttons. And your comment was a response to the article.
And despite your lengthy reply, you still haven't suggested why replacing a physical depressed button with a haptic one has any ergonomic implications, given that the user interaction appears identical.
> I never make comments on HN that are deliberately intended to offend... given your nonsensical comment.
Well calling my comment "nonsensical" continues to offend, and it's awfully hard to see it as anything but deliberate. Again, I suggest you look at HN guidelines which you are continuing to break.