Earlier quoted context omitted.
Now try familytreenow.com for free or spokeo.com if you want to waste a dollar on a trial. Pretty sure they won't be wrong or out of date.
The first one is indeed much closer for me. Still doesn't have my current phone number and while the broad strokes are there the dates are wildly inaccurate. Looking at my immediate family though, I actually seem to have the worst hygiene! It's 0/5 in providing an accurate phone number for any of us.
“They wanted my Instagram handle, and somehow they've now got it.”
81–90 of 111 posts
Re: “They wanted my Instagram handle, and somehow they've now got it.”
#82I don't know this person but objectively speaking, given the facts of the situation, I would say that it's more likely he sold his account and now wants it back for whatever reason. Maybe they people who bought it grifted him somehow and managed to reverse payment or something else. I wouldn't accuse someone of lying when I have no basis to, and I'm not. I'm just saying it's the more likely scenario versus some IG em…
Re: “They wanted my Instagram handle, and somehow they've now got it.”
#83I don't know this person but objectively speaking, given the facts of the situation, I would say that it's more likely he sold his account and now wants it back for whatever reason. Maybe they people who bought it grifted him somehow and managed to reverse payment or something else. I wouldn't accuse someone of lying when I have no basis to, and I'm not. I'm just saying it's the more likely scenario versus some IG em…
I don't think most IG employees have a high-paying career – their support staff are probably located in countries with the lowest possible wages and it would not take a lot of money (from the perspective of the mentioned 'crypto bros') to bribe someone.
Also according to the post those 'crypto bros' wanted exactly _his_ IG handle, not any other 'higher value' handle.
Re: “They wanted my Instagram handle, and somehow they've now got it.”
#84Re: “They wanted my Instagram handle, and somehow they've now got it.”
#85Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I wouldn't accuse someone of lying when I have no basis to, and I'm not. Uh, yeah you are.
I'm just stating likelihoods. I give him the benefit of the doubt. I only mention this to be conversational and to see if anyone else noticed something that might corroborate the theory. It makes little to no sense that this would be an inside job. It makes a lot of sense that this person just wants their account back after willfully giving it up. If you had an inside connection to take over an account, why wouldn't…
In your opinion.
I do not share that opinion.
> why wouldn't you use it on something much much higher profile and with a lot more (i.e. any) profit potential?
Because it dramatically increases the likelihood of getting caught. Selling access to valuable but not high profile accounts is exactly what I'd do if I was a cautious insider looking to make a little extra cash on the dark web.
This guy happened to get lucky and his story caught some attention. Most don't.
Re: “They wanted my Instagram handle, and somehow they've now got it.”
#86Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm just stating likelihoods. I give him the benefit of the doubt. I only mention this to be conversational and to see if anyone else noticed something that might corroborate the theory. It makes little to no sense that this would be an inside job. It makes a lot of sense that this person just wants their account back after willfully giving it up. If you had an inside connection to take over an account, why wouldn't…
> It makes little to no sense that this would be an inside job. In your opinion. I do not share that opinion. > why wouldn't you use it on something much much higher profile and with a lot more (i.e. any) profit potential? Because it dramatically increases the likelihood of getting caught. Selling access to valuable but not high profile accounts is exactly what I'd do if I was a cautious insider looking to make a lit…
Re: “They wanted my Instagram handle, and somehow they've now got it.”
#87It's obvious in retrospect that one of the main ways tech companies make money is scale, without the costs that physical based companies bear with scale.
For example, you go to a shop, and they have employees they have to pay. When the shop scales, so does the number of employees. Tech companies aren't like that though. You write software, then scale it to as many users as possible (billions, in some cases), but their cheat-code, is that they don't provide support of any meaningful kind.
They can get away with it because they're not bound by physical interaction, and nobody's holding them accountable. Law is always understandably slow to catch up, but hopefully we'll get some reasonable regulation around tech soon.
Re: “They wanted my Instagram handle, and somehow they've now got it.”
#88There’s a black market business being run by Meta employees, selling the ability to take over these accounts from the inside for a price. They then funnel that cash back to family and friends and launder that cash through various other means. NYT reported about it last year.
I'd love the link if you have it
Re: “They wanted my Instagram handle, and somehow they've now got it.”
#89Earlier quoted context omitted.
FB's net income for 2022 was $28.83 billion. They could drop that to $28.82 billion and fund a good size customer support team.
I think you underestimate either the cost or the scale of support tickets that would flood in constantly.